parable

Gospel for June 16, 2024

mark 4.33START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Mark 4:26-34
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

Jesus uses parables to illustrate his teaching, particularly about the kingdom of God.  A parable connects with the listener on a concrete level, using familiar experiences and images with which they can identify.

The first parable in this passage is fairly direct.  The kingdom of God is compared to seed scattered in the field that grows and matures while concealed from sight, and then finally is harvested when it is mature.

Note that Jesus is focusing here on the mysterious nature of the kingdom.  Like the grain, the kingdom grows even after the sower has sown it, and while he is unaware of its progress:

God’s Kingdom is as if a man should cast seed on the earth, and should sleep and rise night and day, and the seed should spring up and grow, he doesn’t know how.

Ultimately, though, there is the inevitability of judgment — the harvest:

But when the fruit is ripe, immediately he puts in the sickle, because the harvest has come.

Likewise the kingdom of God begins simply, and grows, and then comes to final harvest on the Day of the Lord.

In the second parable, Jesus speaks of the mustard seed, which he says:

is less than all the seeds that are on the earth.

Yet it grows to become the largest of the plants in the garden.  In other words, however humbly or small the kingdom begins, it will inevitably become magnificent.

Finally, Mark’s Gospel makes clear that Jesus is seeking to accommodate the understanding of the people by telling them parables.  As a wise teacher, he knows when to give his students a break:

Without a parable he didn’t speak to them; but privately to his own disciples he explained everything.

To his disciples, he interpreted the hidden meanings of his parables.

APPLY:  

There are two applications I’d like to touch on — the purpose of the parable as a figure of speech, and the general meaning of these particular parables.

There seems to be dual purpose to the parables Jesus teaches.  On the one hand they connect to simple, everyday experiences.  But on the other hand, they seem to exceed the initial understanding of many who hear them, including the most erudite among them — the Pharisees and teachers of the law.

Jesus tells his disciples:

To you is given the mystery of God’s Kingdom, but to those who are outside, all things are done in parables, that ‘seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest perhaps they should turn again, and their sins should be forgiven them’ (Mark 4:11-12).

To those who are open to spiritual insights, the parables may become clear; but to those who are stubborn and closed minded, they remain a mystery.

The second application I’d like to make is this — Jesus is telling us something very important about the nature of the kingdom of God, and our experience of it.

We may tend to expect impressive magnificence when we think of the kingdom of God. But Jesus is conveying the truth that the kingdom of God doesn’t necessarily come in great displays, or with impressive beginnings.  In fact, the kingdom will come in slow, gradual measures until one day it becomes a universal reality.

This is a counter-narrative to the oft quoted descriptions of the kingdom of God as a sudden, cataclysmic event.  Both views are present in Scripture, but perhaps we can reconcile the two by realizing that both are true.

We may have had the experience of planting a seed and then forgetting about it, until one day the flower has appeared in all its glory! The seed was present and growing, but not manifest until it bloomed. When we finally saw the flower, it may have startled us as though it appeared from nowhere.

What Jesus is saying is that the kingdom of God is already present, all around us, just as the seed is concealed and yet growing despite being hidden.  Then, one day, the reality of the kingdom of God is revealed as the most dominant reality of them all.  In that day what has always been true and real will be revealed, and:

every eye will see (Revelation 1:7).

RESPOND: 

There must always be a certain level of humility when it comes to understanding Biblical and spiritual truth.  We must always assume that there is more to learn.

In these parables, I am reminded that the kingdom of God is already present — and one day it will be revealed to all people everywhere.

We must live in the time between the now of the kingdom, where God’s love and grace are already present among us; and the not yet, anticipating that time when the kingdom will be fully and finally revealed everywhere and to everyone.

Lord, open my eyes to see the evidence of your kingdom that is all around me.  Your kingdom is here, and it is coming.  Prepare me now and forever!  Amen!

PHOTOS:
The photo used for "Mark 4:33" is “Planting seeds of knowledge” by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license.

Gospel for November 19, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Matthew 25:14-30
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

A common motif in Jesus’ parables relates to the absent owner or king who returns to check up on his property.  The ultimate subject is the Kingdom of God, and how his hearers are to prepare for its coming.

In this parable, the servants are entrusted with a significant amount of money, with the denomination of “a talent.”  A talent was worth about 20 years of a day laborer’s wage. Multiply that by five, or even two, and we’re talking about a fortune!  Even one talent is significant.

The plot of the parable is obvious — the first two servants are faithful stewards of the master’s money and they double the initial investment. So, they are entrusted with more responsibility and are welcomed into the hospitality of the master.

The third servant is fearful of the consequences of failure, and merely hides what he has received.  Instead of reward, the consequences of his passive inaction are grave.

The message is clear — the faithful servant is the one whose diligence increases and improves the original investment. They receive reward and relationship with the master.  The unfaithful servant does nothing and receives punishment.

APPLY:  

Whether we are talking about money, or “talents” as in abilities or spiritual gifts, we are not created equal.  Some folks simply receive more than others, whether because of genetic predisposition, or inheritance, or innate ability.

But what Jesus seems to say is that what really matters is not how much or how little we have received, but what we do with it.  The naturally talented, intelligent student from a privileged background who accomplishes little is more to be pitied than the slow student from an underprivileged background who works hard and strives to overcome his limitations.

We do not all have equal natural gifts, but we can all be equally diligent.  It is not what we have received that defines us, but what we do with what we have received. So, Jesus praises diligence as one of the hallmarks of the citizen of the Kingdom of God.

We are also reminded that the property or “talents” are not ours.  They were given by God, and must be returned to God.  Our part is to manage our talents well. Ultimately, everything belongs to God; and God will hold us accountable for how we have invested and improved all that he has given us.

RESPOND: 

Everything that I own, every ability I have, every opportunity I’ve been given can ultimately be traced back to God.  I hope that I have been at least somewhat faithful in my use of time and opportunity. I know that I have squandered more opportunities than I care to remember.  But as long as there is time, it is never too late.

I pray, by your mercy, that one day I will hear the words that you proclaim to those who have been faithful with their trust: ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’ I acknowledge that all my ‘talents,’ with the many connotations of that word, come from you.  Please forgive me where I have failed in my trust, and keep me faithful.  Amen.

PHOTOS:
Glenda Marie Rose” by Cindy Mc is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic license.

Gospel Reading for November 12, 2023

This detail of the foolish virgins from a stained glass window in St Giles’ church Oxford was photographed by Fr. Lawrence Lew, O.P.

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Matthew 25:1-13
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

This is an eschatological passage, which means that it relates to last things.  Jesus is warning the disciples that they are to be ready for the coming of the end of the age because they will not know exactly when that will be.

The wedding feast is a common Biblical image for the end of the age and coming of the kingdom of God.

A little familiarity with weddings in the Jewish world of the first century can make these details come to life. It was the custom for the bridegroom to go and build a house for himself and his bride following the betrothal.  And when the father determined that the house was acceptable, he granted the son permission to go and gather his bride and bring her back for the feast.  This usually happened at night with a festive procession through the town, with torches and singing.  So, the virgins waiting for the coming of the bridegroom at night, at an unknown time, is not at all far-fetched.  There were no synchronized watches in those days!

But the real issue here is being prepared for the unknown time of arrival.  The five wise virgins had brought supplemental oil in case the bridegroom was tardy — the five foolish did not.

Those who are prepared are welcomed in to the brightly lit home for the wedding feast — the unprepared are shut out in the dark.

Jesus makes his message clear:

Watch therefore, for you don’t know the day nor the hour in which the Son of Man is coming.

APPLY:  

This may seem harsh to our modern ears — why couldn’t the five wise virgins share some oil? Isn’t that the Christian thing to do? And why didn’t the bridegroom just relax and let the foolish virgins in?

From our perspective, it all seems unreasonable — but Jesus is making one simple point.  Watch.  Be prepared.  You never know what will happen and when the Lord will come.

RESPOND: 

I do not know when Jesus will return, but I am deeply aware that he has promised to do so.  My job, if I am to be wise, is to be ready — to turn to him in faith, to tell others to do the same.  If I am to take the interpretation of the parable to the next level, then I need to warn the foolish folks around me to be ready — buy oil, so to speak — by focusing on their faith.

Our Lord, I confess I feel inadequately prepared for your coming sometimes — but I do know that you are with me, whatever a day might bring.  Help me to face the future with anticipation that you will meet me there.  Amen. 

PHOTOS:
Foolish Virgins” by Fr. Lawrence Lew, O.P. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license.

Gospel for October 15, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Matthew 22:1-14
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

Jesus returns again to one of his favored themes — the Kingdom of Heaven.  However, he continues to confront the hostility of the chief priests and Pharisees head-on.  Here again, he offers a contrast between those who reject the Kingdom of Heaven and those who are invited instead.

The setting of this parable is a joyous occasion — the marriage feast of the king’s son.  We are mindful that the marriage feast is a familiar metaphor used to describe the great and joyful eschatological gathering at the end of time (Matthew 25:10; Luke 12:36; Revelation 19:7-9).

Of course, the identity of the king and the son are easy to decipher — God the Father and God the Son (Jesus, of course) are anticipating the marriage feast of the son.  And the king sends out his servants (perhaps the apostles?) who invite the guests to the wedding, where the cattle and fatlings have already been slaughtered and barbecued.

But the invitations are spurned!  The king’s invitation is mocked, and the invited guests have better things to do:

But they made light of it, and went their ways, one to his own farm, another to his merchandise, and the rest grabbed his servants, and treated them shamefully, and killed them.

Jesus is obviously mindful of his own impending death, and the persecution of his followers that will ensue.  And in his parable, the consequences when the invited guests refuse to attend are dire:

When the king heard that, he was angry, and sent his armies, destroyed those murderers, and burned their city.

Jesus doesn’t name the invited guests, or tell whom they represent, but it isn’t difficult to draw conclusions from his previous interactions with the chief priests and Pharisees.  They were sons of Abraham (see Matthew 3:9), and as such had been chosen from among all the nations as a representative and holy nation (see Deuteronomy 7:6-9).  But this invitation must be answered with faith and obedience.  And as the parable tells us, that isn’t their response to the marriage feast.

The king declares that the invited guests weren’t worthy — as they demonstrated by their treatment of the king’s servants.  So the king sends his messengers to invite all whom they can find:

Then he said to his servants, ‘The wedding is ready, but those who were invited weren’t worthy.  Go therefore to the intersections of the highways, and as many as you may find, invite to the marriage feast.’ Those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together as many as they found, both bad and good.

There are a couple of key theological points to notice here:

  • First, the invitation has now become general — the servant messengers are to invite anyone and everyone they encounter. There is hot food at a feast that will go to waste if someone doesn’t come and eat it!
  • Second, we get a glimpse of grace. The messengers don’t discriminate between bad and good people — all are welcomed!  The terms bad and good may denote something more than personal morality.  Quite often we have noted that it is the good people (the respectable, the elites — i.e., the chief priests and Pharisees) who become self-righteous and reject the Kingdom of Heaven And it is the bad people who are the first to recognize their need for Jesus, and who respond to him in repentance (the tax collectors, prostitutes, Gentiles).

Nevertheless, we aren’t meant to see this parable as a pretext for universalism.  Jesus doesn’t leave that option open.  When the wedding tent is filled with guests, the king looks out over the guests and sees one man who hasn’t dressed properly for the occasion:

 But when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man who didn’t have on wedding clothing, and he said to him, ‘Friend, how did you come in here not wearing wedding clothing?’ He was speechless.  Then the king said to the servants, ‘Bind him hand and foot, take him away, and throw him into the outer darkness; there is where the weeping and grinding of teeth will be.’

This is a stark vision of judgment.  Obviously, the wedding clothing represents something far more important than a mere fashion statement.  It was customary at a wedding in ancient Israel for everyone to wear festive garments.  To do otherwise was to be disrespectful to the marriage party.  There is even the suggestion that the host of a wedding would often provide wedding garments to their guests — much the way some clubs provide blazers and even ties when they are required for dining.  But what is this wedding clothing?  I have tried to address this question in the Apply section below.

What is clear is that the failure to wear proper attire is a serious breach of protocol.  The guest isn’t merely asked to leave — he is tied and thrown into outer darkness.  This is obviously a figurative and vivid description of hell.

Finally, Jesus repeats the same phrase that he uttered in Matthew 20:16, when he told the parable of the laborers who came at different hours of the day to work in the vineyard:

For many are called, but few chosen.

In the context of the marriage feast, we are reminded that the king originally invites guests who refuse his hospitality, sometimes quite violently — and the king deals with them accordingly.  And then the invitation is issued to people not on the original guest list.  But even they must be evaluated for proper qualifications.  Again, more on that subject in the Apply section.

APPLY:  

All of us are invited to the marriage feast of the Lamb.  However, there are those who reject his invitation.  This suggests the freedom that God grants to us concerning our response to his grace.  We can accept his invitation, or reject it.

However, we can’t help but puzzle over the guest who is thrown into the outer darkness because he isn’t wearing the right outfit.  Obviously, there is far more going on here.  This wedding garment is more than a wedding garment.  But what does it represent?

Jesus doesn’t tell us, and searching the Scriptures yields only one likely explanation, from John’s Revelation:

“For the marriage of the Lamb has come, and his wife has made herself ready.”  It was given to her that she would array herself in bright, pure, fine linen: for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. (Revelation 19:7-8).

We might be tempted to conclude that the wedding clothes are earned by the righteous acts of the saints. And there is a sense in which this is certainly true.  In his Sermon on the Mount, Jesus is very clear about the requirement for a fruitful life:

A good tree can’t produce evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree produce good fruit. Every tree that doesn’t grow good fruit is cut down, and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits you will know them (Matthew 7:18-20).

I know this offends the sensibilities of those of us grounded in a Pauline theology of sola fide (faith alone).  What is required of us is a sense of balance — we are saved by grace, which is received by faith.  But as Paul points out — although the works of the law and of the flesh aren’t capable of saving us because they are our works rather than God’s works, still there is a response that God’s grace draws from us.  As he says:

For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision amounts to anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith working through love (Galatians 5:6).

Faith is not merely an ‘assent’ to the truth of some doctrinal propositions.  Faith works through love!  The Greek root of the word work is energeia — where we get our word energy.  Faith is an active response to the grace of God that results in fruits.

As another of my favorite verses suggests, there is synergy between ourselves and God:

work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. For it is God who works in you both to will and to work, for his good pleasure (Philippians 2:12-13).

There is a dynamic reciprocity in this verse — we work because it is God who is working in us.  We respond to God’s energeia working in us through faith and obedience.

We are reminded that John the Baptist told people to:

produce fruit worthy of repentance! (Matthew 3:8)

But we must never forget that God is always the one who is at work in us — through his Holy Spirit, God convicts us of sin and brings us to repentance; it is God who justifies us by his grace through Christ; and God who completes his work of sanctifying grace in us as we obey him and keep his commands to love God and love neighbor.

We don the wedding garment because God has fashioned it for us.

RESPOND: 

The first time I watched the film O Brother, Where Art Thou? I was taken with the skillful storytelling, and the interweaving of songs with the story-line.  As an American Southerner, I have said that anyone who wants to understand some of the forces that have shaped Southern culture — for good or ill — should watch this Coen brothers film.

And as a Southern Christian, I was especially taken by the song sung by the young daughters of Everett Ulysses McGill at a campaign rally (of all places!).  Maybelle Carter’s song captures some of the features of Southern Gospel music, but also reminds us of a central theme in the parable of Jesus:

In the highways, in the hedges
In the highways, in the hedges
In the highways, in the hedges
I’ll be somewhere workin’ for my Lord

I’ll be somewhere workin’
I’ll be somewhere workin’
I’ll be somewhere workin’ for my Lord
I’ll be somewhere workin’
I’ll be somewhere workin’
I’ll be somewhere workin’ for my Lord

If He calls me, I will answer
If He calls me, I will answer
If He calls me, I will answer
I’ll be somewhere workin’ for my Lord

We tend to focus on those who appear to be the main characters in Jesus’ parable of the marriage feast — the king, the son, the guests who spurn the king’s invitation, the outcasts in the highways who are invited, and the guest who is underdressed at the wedding.  But what about the servants of the king who go out at the king’s command and invite as many as they can to attend the feast?  Who are those people?

Are they not the apostles, the evangelists, the pastors, the missionaries, the Sunday School teachers, the Christian lay people who see their lives as an extension of the Great Commission, when Jesus sends us out into those highways and hedges:

Go, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I commanded you (Matthew 28:19-20).

Maybelle Carter’s song captures the Christian’s lifestyle that will always be somewhere workin’ for my Lord. 

Lord, your invitation to the wedding feast is given to all of us.  I pray that all may accept that invitation, but I am reminded that some do reject it.  May I do my part to be out in the highways and hedges inviting your guests to the great wedding feast of the Lamb. Amen. 

PHOTOS:
"You're invited" by Agnes L. Reynes-Williams is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license.

Gospel for October 8, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Matthew 21:33-46
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

Jesus continues to confront his adversaries, using a parable as his medium.  Previously, he had confounded their challenge to his authority through key questions; he had also pointed out their unrepentant pride with a parable about two sons (Matthew 21:23-32).

Now Jesus tells a parable with a familiar setting — a vineyard.  The vineyard and the vine were familiar Old Testament symbols, signifying the nation of Israel (cf. Isaiah 5:1-7; 27:2-3; Jeremiah 2:21; 12:10; Ezekiel 17).  Telling such a story, featuring a familiar image for Israel, would certainly arrest the attention of the chief priests and Pharisees.  Surely they understand that he is talking about Israel, and specifically about them.

In short, here is the outline of the parable — the landlord has planted a vineyard, complete with wine press and tower.  He leases this vineyard out to tenant farmers — basically, they are sharecroppers.  When the landlord sends his own employees to collect his share of the yield, his servants are beaten, killed and stoned to death.  When he sends his own son, assuming the tenants will treat him with honor, they plot his death.  Their logic is that once the heir is dead, they will get his inheritance.

After telling this parable, Jesus returns to his interrogative method — he asks the question:

When therefore the lord of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those farmers?

Somehow, the Pharisees and priests have gotten involved in the story.  They seem oblivious to the point Jesus is making, and describe in colorful terms what will happen:

 They told him, “He will miserably destroy those miserable men, and will lease out the vineyard to other farmers, who will give him the fruit in its season.”

Once again, Jesus springs the trap, using the very Scriptures that these men should know, from Psalm 118:22-23:

Jesus said to them, “Did you never read in the Scriptures,
‘The stone which the builders rejected,
the same was made the head of the corner.
This was from the Lord.
It is marvelous in our eyes?'”

This metaphor was another fairly familiar Old Testament image (cf Isaiah 28:16).  The cornerstone of a building is considered foundational — it unites two intersecting walls.  Jesus picks up this image from the Psalm and applies it to himself as the Messiah — saying that those who reject him will find themselves crushed by that stone.  This image of the cornerstone will be repeated by other New Testament writers, signifying that Jesus is foundational to salvation and the church, and that one’s response to him will determine one’s destiny (Ephesians 2:19-22; 1 Peter 2:5-7).

Jesus now makes it quite clear — without parables, questions, dialectical method — exactly what he means:

Therefore I tell you, God’s Kingdom will be taken away from you, and will be given to a nation producing its fruit.  He who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces, but on whomever it will fall, it will scatter him as dust.

The point is taken — the tenants of the vineyard represent the chief priests and the Pharisees, and also all their predecessors who rejected the prophets who came on behalf of God.  Now, Jesus is prophesying his own death represented by the son of the landlord.  But he is also warning the leaders that the tables will be turned — the son who is killed is also the cornerstone.  And when they reject him, they will be crushed. God will raise up a new nation which produces fruit — this new nation will be the church.

This time the adversarial leaders get it.  They realize Jesus is accusing them of rejecting both the prophets, and the Son himself:

When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard his parables, they perceived that he spoke about them.

But they are stymied.  Just as Jesus had paralyzed them earlier by asking where the authority of the popular John the Baptist came from, now the leaders are aware that they are powerless:

 When they sought to seize him, they feared the multitudes, because they considered him to be a prophet.

His arrest and the execution will come, as Jesus knows.  But he uses his popularity with the people as a screen. He will choose the time and place that he is to offer up his life as a sacrifice.

APPLY:  

Our study of the Bible includes the Old Testament for a very good reason — it is impossible to fully understand and appreciate the New Covenant introduced by Jesus without understanding that he fulfills the promises and hopes of Israel.

The images in this passage — the vineyard, the cornerstone, the allusion to Psalm 118 — all remind us that the story of the New Testament is continuous with the Old Testament.

And we must be careful not to read any anti-Semitism into this passage.  The chief priests and Pharisees do fail to recognize Jesus as the Messiah, in fulfillment of the prophecies.  But the first believers, the early church, and Jesus himself were Jews.

What they do see is that the promises of God, the Messiah, salvation, and the church, were to be for all people — Jews and Gentiles alike.  Paul interprets this very well in a passage that deserves to be quoted in full:

Therefore remember that once you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called “uncircumcision” by that which is called “circumcision”, (in the flesh, made by hands); that you were at that time separate from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of the promise, having no hope and without God in the world.  But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off are made near in the blood of Christ.  For he is our peace, who made both one, and broke down the middle wall of partition, having abolished in the flesh the hostility, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man of the two, making peace; and might reconcile them both in one body to God through the cross, having killed the hostility thereby. He came and preached peace to you who were far off and to those who were near. For through him we both have our access in one Spirit to the Father. So then you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but you are fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God,  being built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the chief cornerstone;  in whom the whole building, fitted together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord;  in whom you also are built together for a habitation of God in the Spirit (Ephesians 2:11-22).

This passage not only reminds us that Christ is our chief cornerstone, but that all who believe are now incorporated into the household of God, both Jews and Gentiles now made one in Christ.

RESPOND: 

The tension is building as Jesus draws closer and closer to the end.  His parables and his questions are surgical. Jesus exposes the hostility of his adversaries, which becomes more and more apparent.

But Jesus also makes it clear to us just who he is, and what we should believe.  He is the Son, who is rejected by the tenants and killed.  And he is the cornerstone of our faith and our church — and those who reject him reject him at their peril.  But to those who believe — what he has done is marvelous in our eyes.

Lord, you are the cornerstone of my faith.  May I build my life on your foundation. Amen.

PHOTOS:
"Cornerstone" by Brett Jordan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

Gospel for October 1, 2023

“Les pharisiens questionnent Jésus” (The Pharisees Question Jesus) by James Tissot is part of the Brooklyn Museum’s Euopean Art Collection.

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Matthew 21:23-32
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

This week’s lectionary Gospel passage seems to begin in the middle of things.  Jesus has come to Jerusalem in order to fulfill his ministry.  While he is teaching in the temple, the chief priests and elders of the people approach him. It is clear that they have an agenda.  They ask a direct and pointed question:

By what authority do you do these things? Who gave you this authority?

On the one hand, what is unsaid is this — they are implying that they are the authority in the temple.  What business does Jesus have teaching there?  He is no priest, nor a proper rabbi.  He is a carpenter preacher from the sticks in Galilee.

But what are these things which they reference?  Surely it is not merely the teaching that Jesus is doing in the temple.  In the first sixteen verses of chapter 21, Jesus has ridden into Jerusalem on the back of a donkey, very consciously fulfilling the prophecy of Zechariah 9:9 concerning the coming of their king.  He has been greeted with a near-riot — the people cut branches from the trees and waved them as though greeting a conqueror, and shouted:

Hosanna  to the son of David! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord! Hosanna in the highest! (Matthew 21:9).

This is clearly a Messianic slogan.  Hosanna means Save Us, and as a descendent of David, the crowds expected him to assume the Davidic throne and restore the kingdom to Israel — after expelling the Roman legions, of course!

So when the priests and elders ask their question, they are clearly aware of the political dangers posed to an occupied city and nation.  They have no doubt heard of the healings, miracles, and feeding of the multitude in the wilderness.  Whether they believed any of it or not was irrelevant.  This so-called son of David was now within the gates, and they must exert their own authority over him!

But they do so in a roundabout way — by asking the question.  This introduces a dialogue between Jesus and these leaders. Here we see the brilliant dialectical technique of Jesus, shared by so many brilliant philosophers like Socrates (dialectic is a method of debate that seeks through dialogue to arrive at truth).  Asked a question, Jesus answers with a more incisive question.  This is the method of great teachers.  And Jesus is the greatest.

Brilliantly, Jesus answers a question with a question — much the way some of the great philosophers have done.  Instead of stating the source of his authority as a maxim, Jesus gives them the opportunity to work through their own thoughts:

Jesus answered them, “I also will ask you one question, which if you tell me, I likewise will tell you by what authority I do these things. The baptism of John, where was it from? From heaven or from men?”

We have seen Jesus use questions in the past to bring out the truth, as when he asks the disciples “Who do men say that the Son of Man is?”  (Matthew 16:12-16).  In this instance, he uses a question to confound the leaders.  He knows exactly how compromised they will be in trying to determine the authority of his cousin John, who preached fearlessly, baptized multitudes as a sign of repentance, and was martyred by King Herod.

The leaders are in a quandary.  They know the crowds are listening, and may turn on them if they answer in an unpopular manner:

They reasoned with themselves, saying, “If we say, ‘From heaven,’ he will ask us, ‘Why then did you not believe him?’  But if we say, ‘From men,’ we fear the multitude, for all hold John as a prophet.”

Their dilemma is exquisite.  Jesus has painted them into a corner.  These “authorities” had rejected the apocalyptic vision of John when he promised the advent of the Kingdom of God, and had refused to submit to his baptism (actually, there were Pharisees and Sadducees that came to John seeking baptism, but he had greeted them harshly and criticized their pretext for superiority based on their heritage.  He insisted that they too needed to show their repentance by their actions.  See Matthew 3:7-9).

When these chief priests and leaders wrangle with one another about how they should answer Jesus’ question, these “wise” men can’t resolve it.  Their answer is almost comical:

 They answered Jesus, and said, “We don’t know.”

In rhetorical terms, Jesus had trapped them.  Since they can’t even decide whether John was from God or merely a self-anointed prophet, Jesus tells them he is under no obligation to prove himself to them:

He also said to them, “Neither will I tell you by what authority I do these things.”

The authority of Jesus is self-explanatory, based on his fruits — ironically,  John had demanded of the Pharisees and the Sadducees that they produce fruits to prove their repentance!  When John the Baptist, imprisoned by Herod, had sent messengers to ask Jesus if he was the Messiah, Jesus had answered this way:

Go and tell John the things which you hear and see:  the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear,  the dead are raised up, and the poor have good news preached to them.  Blessed is he who finds no occasion for stumbling in me (Matthew 11:4-6).

Jesus then turns to one of his favorite teaching methods — the story, or parable.  The parable allows him to engage the imagination of his audience, and forces them to figure out the answer:

 But what do you think? A man had two sons, and he came to the first, and said, ‘Son, go work today in my vineyard.’  He answered, ‘I will not,’ but afterward he changed his mind, and went. He came to the second, and said the same thing. He answered, ‘I go, sir,’ but he didn’t go.  Which of the two did the will of his father?”

When Jesus asks this question, the leaders feel compelled to answer.  This seems like an easy question:

They said to him, “The first.”

Then Jesus springs his verbal trap.  They are the second son, who pretends to be obedient, making promises and then not keeping them.  Instead, Jesus points out that those whom the ‘religious’ people deem to be unacceptable are truly the first son:

Jesus said to them, “Most certainly I tell you that the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering into God’s Kingdom before you.”

To be clear, Jesus is not excusing the covetous extortion of most of the tax collectors of that day, nor is he endorsing the sex trade.  Instead, he is pointing out that these people recognized their own sin and need for repentance when John came, and they were the ones who came for baptism:

For John came to you in the way of righteousness, and you didn’t believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes believed him. When you saw it, you didn’t even repent afterward, that you might believe him.

The contrast between sinners who know they need to repent and the self-righteous who delude themselves and fail to repent is clear.  The former enter the Kingdom of God because they depend on God’s mercy, not their own righteousness.

Incidentally, Jesus himself now answers the question that he asked at the beginning of this passage about John’s authority:

John came to you in the way of righteousness.

John’s authority came from a righteous God.

APPLY:  

Where does authority come from?  Ultimately — in the Kingdom of God — it doesn’t come from titles, or pedigrees, or education, or even political and military might.  Authority comes from righteousness.  Specifically, the righteousness of the Kingdom of God.

By this definition Herod had a title, but John had authority.  The chief priests and the leaders of the people had titles, but Jesus had authority.  True, the naked, raw, violent titles of Herod and the others gave them power over the very lives of John and Jesus — at least temporarily.

But when Pilate asserts in John’s Gospel that he has power over the life and death of Jesus, Jesus refutes him:

You would have no power at all against me, unless it were given to you from above (John 19:11).

And the power of God would be vindicated by the resurrection of Jesus.

We are not to be too impressed by the powers and principalities of this world.  Their authority is derivative, and it is temporary.

We are also to remember that none of us is without sin — whether we are the ones society considers to be outcasts (tax collectors and prostitutes) or those whom society honors (clergy and leaders).  All those who truly repent and seek God’s mercy shall enter the Kingdom of Heaven.

RESPOND: 

My wife is a musician, with a degree in music education.  She has shared with me about a concept called discovery-learning.  This is a method that relies on a student being exposed to concepts and educational objectives, and then processing and interacting with these concepts and objectives and figuring it out for themselves.  This is in contrast to the lecture or the rote-learning method of education.

I’m struck by the fact that Jesus uses such discovery-learning techniques, together with a dialectical method (dialectical means to engage in logical dialogue) quite often in his teaching.  True, he also preaches messages in longer sections, such as the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5 to 7).  But he tends to invite people to discover for themselves who he is or what he’s talking about.

We have cited several examples of this kind of technique in the Bible study:

  • He asks John the Baptist’s messengers to go back to John and tell him that they’ve seen Jesus heal, cast out demons, and teach the poor, and to draw his own conclusions.
  • He asks the disciples, Who do men say that the Son of Man is?
  • And he poses a difficult, loaded question about the authority of John, and also an easy question about which son was obedient to his father, and thus makes the chief priests and leaders figure it out on their own.

Together with his plentiful parables, we get the sense that Jesus really is a Master Teacher.  When people engage in discovery learning, they own what they learn.  It isn’t something that some ‘authority’ has dispensed.  They know it from their own experience.

In this case, the chief priests and leaders come face to face with a figure of formidable authority — and find themselves cast in the role of the son who pretends to obey his father, but actually does not.

When confronted with their own shortcomings, they can either repent and follow Jesus — or they can reject him and begin the process that will lead to his cross.  We know which they will choose.  But no one else is responsible except themselves for their choice.

Lord, I pray that I won’t be so impressed by human authority, power and glitziness that I miss the source of real authority.  You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God.  I seek to listen to you.  Amen. 

PHOTOS:
"Les pharisiens questionnent Jésus" by James Tissot is in the Public Domain.

Gospel for September 24, 2023

“And when they received it, they grumbled against the landowner,  saying, ‘These last worked only one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the day and the scorching heat.’ ” (Matthew 20:11-12, World English Bible)

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Matthew 20:1-16
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

One of the central themes of the teaching of Jesus is the Kingdom of Heaven.  He examines this concept of the reign of God from various perspectives — as a present reality and as a future hope.  The Kingdom is both a now and a not yet in terms of its consummation.

In the parable he tells in Matthew 20:1-16, the Kingdom of Heaven is described in agricultural terms during the time of harvest when the owner of the vineyard needs extra workers to complete the ingathering.  There is work to be done, to be sure — but the emphasis here is the master’s sovereignty over his own household, and the theme of grace.

Jesus knows the economic and agricultural context of his time very well.  This was a time when day-labor was a common practice.  Men would wait early in the morning near a city gate or in the marketplace of a village hoping to be hired for the day.  They would work all day, and would receive their day’s wages at the end of the day — a denarius was a day’s wage at that time. For men with families and mouths to feed, this was an important “employment bureau.”

The master of the household himself goes out to recruit workers, early in the morning.  Time in the ancient world was reckoned a little differently, since there was no standardized Coordinated Universal Time established by highly precise atomic clocks, as there is today.  The Jews had adapted to the Roman method of telling time. The day was divided into twelve hours of daylight and four watches in the night — the first hour was the first hour after sunrise, beginning roughly at 6 a.m. by our reckoning.  The third hour would have been about 9 a.m.; the sixth hour about noon; the ninth hour about 3 p.m.; and the eleventh hour about 5 p.m.

[Of course, the change of seasons would have altered this somewhat, but they still measured the first hour from sunrise.  An interesting side note — when monasteries developed later in the history of Christianity, they used a similar measure of time: e.g., Prime was six a.m., Terce was 9 a.m., Sext was 12 p.m., None was 3 p.m.  These were the Latin names for “first, third, sixth, and ninth.”  Six p.m. was Vespers, Compline at 9 p.m., ending with Midnight prayers.  This was important because the monastic community paused every three hours for prayer, based on Psalm 119:164 — Seven times a day, I praise you, because of your righteous ordinances.]

In the scenario of the parable, there was more than enough work to be done.  The harvest was plentiful.  So the master returns to the marketplace to hire additional workers after his initial hires four more times, at 9 a.m., 12 noon, 3 p.m., and 5 p.m.

One little interesting detail — when the master asks at 5 p.m. why the men are standing around idle, they answer:

Because no one has hired us.

We can only speculate about this.  Were they not hired because they had a bad work record and no employer wanted them?  Here we see the first hint of the master’s grace — he hires them, though the day is nearly gone:

You also go into the vineyard, and you will receive whatever is right.

At five o’clock during harvest time (which is some time between August and October in the Northern hemisphere, based on how ripened the grapes were), there couldn’t have been much daylight left.  But they go to work and join the other workers in the vineyards.

When the sun sets, the work for the day is done.  It is time to settle accounts with the workers, so the master orders his manager:

Call the laborers and pay them their wages, beginning from the last to the first.

This is interesting, because he pays the last workers first.  We can imagine that there was a high sense of anticipation for all the workers.  Getting paid for one’s hard work is usually a very welcome event. And when the workers who had been harvesting all day long began to hear that the workers who just recently showed up were all getting paid a full denarius, that must have heightened their excitement!  Surely they would get paid far more for about twelve hours of work, compared to those who only worked about an hour.  But their expectations weren’t met:

When the first came, they supposed that they would receive more; and they likewise each received a denarius. When they received it, they murmured against the master of the household, saying, ‘These last have spent one hour, and you have made them equal to us, who have borne the burden of the day and the scorching heat!’

They see the master’s wages as an injustice.  They receive no more than those who just showed up.  But the master reminds them that he has not broken his contract with them.  They agreed to work for a denarius, and that’s what he gave them!  What irked them is the comparison between themselves and the “five o’clockers” who came late.

The master’s point is that he is in control of his treasury.  And he kept his promise to the workers who had worked all day:

But he answered one of them, ‘Friend, I am doing you no wrong. Didn’t you agree with me for a denarius?  Take that which is yours, and go your way. It is my desire to give to this last just as much as to you.  Isn’t it lawful for me to do what I want to with what I own? Or is your eye evil, because I am good?’

The point is that the resentment of the workers is unfair.  They received what they were promised.  The master showed his generosity by giving the same wages to those who came late.  Instead of seeing him as unjust, they needed to adjust their perception — he hadn’t broken his agreement to them, he had actually been extra-generous to the late comers!

Jesus concludes with a somewhat cryptic interpretation of his message:

 So the last will be first, and the first last. For many are called, but few are chosen.

These sentences deserve their own commentary.  Jesus teaches that conventional expectations are turned on their head in the Kingdom of God — those who have little are given much, and those who have much find it taken away; the tax collectors and sinners will get into the Kingdom of God before the “righteous” Pharisees.

Jesus has used this phrase about the first and last prior to this parable.  A rich young man came to Jesus and asked what he must do to be saved.  Jesus tells him to sell everything, give it to the poor, and follow Jesus.  When the rich man turns away sadly, Jesus tells the disciples how difficult it is for the rich to enter the Kingdom of Heaven — it is so difficult for them to leave the security of their possessions for the high adventure and uncertainty of the life of faith.  When the disciples express astonishment at this, and Peter points out that they have forsaken their businesses and their families for Jesus, he promises that they will receive much, much more than they have sacrificed (Matthew 19:16-29).  And then Jesus says for the first time:

 But many will be last who are first; and first who are last (Matthew 19:30).

In today’s lectionary reading, Jesus may certainly have been thinking about the Pharisees, who are comfortable in their religious security blanket of the law; and also about the rich man who finds his security in his wealth.  When compared with this parable of the workers in the vineyard, we are reminded that the first are those who had established their seniority — “we were here first!”  But God’s grace begins with those who were last, who were left out in the initial hiring, and gives them the same opportunity as those who were there at the beginning.

And then there is the difficult saying:

For many are called, but few are chosen.

Does this sentence support the notion of God’s election that only a few are elect by God to salvation?  If so, why are many called?  Again, I return to the story of the rich young man.  Jesus calls him to sell, give, and follow him.  But the choice rests with the rich young man.  He isn’t chosen because he doesn’t choose to follow Jesus — even though Jesus is inviting him to the greatest adventure in the world, worth more than any fortune!

How many more did Jesus choose who refused him? For example, Jesus expresses his dismay when his call is refused by his beloved Jerusalem:

Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets, and stones those who are sent to her! How often I would have gathered your children together, even as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you would not! (Matthew 22:37).

The analogy should be clear — Jesus wished to choose Jerusalem (to gather her children together), but Jerusalem refused his invitation.  They are not chosen because they have refused to be gathered under his wings.

APPLY:  

Aren’t we more like the murmuring workers than we care to admit?  We tend to focus more on our “rights” and “entitlement” rather than God’s gracious generosity and our opportunity to serve him.  We wonder why others who have come after us get the same benefits that we get, when we’ve worked longer hours.

How shallow we can be!  When we begin to question why someone else has received as much grace and mercy as we, we should be thankful for the abundant generosity of God, instead of grumbling that we deserve more.  After all, the fact that we were chosen at the beginning of the day is in itself a kind of grace that exceeds what we deserve!

We shouldn’t compare ourselves to others, but instead should give thanks that God has chosen us at all.

RESPOND: 

I have learned that one of the chief causes of discontent is comparison.  In fact, comparison is what leads to covetousness, jealousy, envy, and, of course, grumbling and resentment.

We see an example of this with the workers who grumble about those “johnny come latelys” that receive the same wages.  But the point is that all of us who receive “wages” from God are receiving grace.  How much grace we receive is up to the giver, not the recipient.  We are to be grateful in any event.

There is also another spiritual lesson here — our expectations set us up for disappointment.  If we begin with gratitude for what we have received and give thanks for what we are to receive, then all is a gift.

As someone once said to me in passing:

Every day is a holiday; every meal is a feast.

I didn’t find out until later that this is a cliche from the Marine Corps — a group of people who know what it is like to work hard, and leave no one behind.  And no one needs to be left behind, unless they choose to be.

Lord, thank you for your grace, that none of us deserve.  Remove any resentment or sense of superiority that I may have toward others, and may I be supremely grateful that I can work for you at the first hour or at the last. Amen.

PHOTOS:
"It's Not Fair"

Gospel for September 17, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Matthew 18:21-35
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

It seems that Peter has been listening carefully to the teaching of Jesus.  In Matthew 18:15-20, Jesus has carefully outlined a procedure whereby conflict might be resolved within the community of faith.  Peter seems to make the connection between this teaching about methods of reconciliation and Jesus’ earlier teaching about forgiveness.

When Jesus taught the disciples about prayer in his Sermon on the Mount, forgiveness was so central that he reiterated the same point after teaching the prayer:

Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors…For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.  But if you don’t forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses (Matthew 5:12, 14-15).

So Peter’s question seems to be in the spirit of Jesus’ teaching.  He says:

Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Until seven times?

No doubt, Peter’s expectation was that Jesus would praise him for his generosity, much as Jesus had praised him when Peter recognized Jesus as the Christ (Matthew 16:16-18).  The number seven is a significant number in the Hebrew world view, symbolizing completeness and perfection.  It would seem that Peter is suggesting a very patient, even “perfect” forbearance toward repeat offenders.

But Jesus’ attitude toward forgiveness is far more expansive — we might even say infinite — than Peter’s proposal.  In fact, Jesus’ answer suggests an exponential difference:

Jesus said to him, “I don’t tell you until seven times, but, until seventy times seven.

Once again, Jesus isn’t speaking literally, but symbolically.  If Peter was literal-minded (which might be likely), he may have been testing the limits of forgiveness.  Is seven times enough, he may have been asking.  But If we do the math, Jesus is suggesting the offender be forgiven four hundred ninety times. This is hardly a literal prescription for forgiveness.  Jesus is taking a number suggested by Peter, symbolizing perfection, and expanding it exponentially.  In other words, forgiveness never ends.

Jesus then employs one of his favored means of communication to illustrate his point about forgiveness — the parable.  He likens the Kingdom of Heaven to a king who calls in his debts.  One debtor owes the king ten thousand talents.  This is an astronomically high number.  Ten thousand talents is the equivalent of three hundred metric tons of silver.

Just for the sake of comparison — ten thousand talents is the equivalent to sixty million denarii, which was the coin of the time.  A denarius was the typical day’s wage for agricultural labor.  Today, the United States Department of Agriculture says that the average day laborers’ wages per hour is between $10.50 to $10.80 per hour.  Those wages would probably look pretty good to a day laborer in Jesus’ time.  A day’s labor in Jesus’ time wouldn’t be eight hours a day — it was sunrise to sunset.  So, if we assume that a normal day might be ten hours, perhaps we are talking about a worker earning $80 to $105 a day.  To cut to the chase, the servants debt might be the equivalent of at least four billion, eight hundred million dollars!  This is an astounding debt!  What on earth did this servant intend to do with that money?  And where did he spend it?!

In short, he just doesn’t have it.  And the consequences are dire — his entire family would pay the debt by being sold into slavery!

 But because he couldn’t pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, with his wife, his children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.

The servant’s response is to throw himself upon the mercy of the king.  He humbles himself and pleads for mercy.  This man who has squandered what amounts to billions of dollars is completely helpless.  He begs:

 The servant therefore fell down and knelt before him, saying, ‘Lord, have patience with me, and I will repay you all!’

Despite the huge debt, the king forgives the entire amount, without even requiring a repayment schedule:

 The lord of that servant, being moved with compassion, released him, and forgave him the debt.

We can only imagine the enormous relief, forgiven of such a huge debt.  And this makes the next events all the more shocking:

But that servant went out, and found one of his fellow servants, who owed him one hundred denarii,  and he grabbed him, and took him by the throat, saying, ‘Pay me what you owe!’ So his fellow servant fell down at his feet and begged him, saying, ‘Have patience with me, and I will repay you!’  He would not, but went and cast him into prison, until he should pay back that which was due.

This servant who has been forgiven a debt in the billions of dollars refuses to forgive a debt which amounts to perhaps $1,050.  This is not a tiny amount of money — but it wouldn’t buy a house today, or a new car.  Compared to the ten thousand talents, one hundred denarii is miniscule.  And yet this man, forgiven of a huge debt, cannot find compassion in his own heart to forgive a debtor who owes him much less.

The irony is staggering.  The hypocrisy is shocking.  And the king’s servants, who see this scenario unfold before their very eyes, could not remain silent.  They reported the servant’s behavior to their king.

The king’s moral outrage is palpable:

Then his lord called him in, and said to him, ‘You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt, because you begged me. Shouldn’t you also have had mercy on your fellow servant, even as I had mercy on you?’

What is interesting is that the consequences for the servant’s hypocritical behavior differ from the king’s original judgment.  His family and property are not sold into slavery.  Instead, all of the consequences fall upon the servant:

 His lord was angry, and delivered him to the tormentors, until he should pay all that was due to him.

It would seem, as was the fashion in ancient times, that the servant was to suffer at the hands of professional torturers.  He was to pay, as it were, with a pound of flesh.

Lest we miss the point of the parable, Jesus makes it very clear:

 So my heavenly Father will also do to you, if you don’t each forgive your brother from your hearts for his misdeeds.

Those who have been forgiven are to forgive others.  Otherwise, they themselves will suffer the consequences of judgment.  A failure to forgive results in a failure to be forgiven.

APPLY:  

Like Peter, don’t we tend to want to measure our responses to grievances and wrongs?  How many times must we forgive, we ask, just like Peter.  Jesus’ answer is that forgiveness is unlimited.

The truth is that forgiveness is at the very heart of the Christian Gospel.  But there is no such thing as cheap grace when it comes to forgiveness.  Forgiveness is costly.

Where we begin is with the ultimate source of forgiveness.  According to Jesus’ parable, forgiveness is equated with something that most of us can understand — financial debt.  Jesus doesn’t single out particular sins.  He suggests that hurts, grievances, and wrongs are equivalent with a sense of indebtedness.

To whom do we owe not only our salvation, our abilities, and even our very existence?  The answer is simple — God himself.  That is who the king in Jesus’ parable represents.  And we all owe a debt to God that none of us can repay.

This debt, incurred by our birth, is increased by our lives that “draw” on God’s account.  And it is our sins — our moral failings, our squandered opportunities, our resentments, lusts, and little selfishnesses — that incur our debt to God.  And this is why Jesus, as the incarnate God on earth, exercises his authority to forgive these debts during his ministry and, finally, on the cross.  When he is crucified at the hands of sinful men, the sinless one says:

Father, forgive them, for they don’t know what they are doing (Luke 23:34).

And this forgiveness pivots toward our relationship with others.  Like the servant in the parable, when we have confessed our faith in Christ and asked his forgiveness, we have been forgiven a massive debt that we could never repay.

So, when it comes to hurts, grievances, and injuries that we have suffered from others — no matter how great — do we really imagine that they surpass the debt that we owe to God?  Again, we are like the servant in the parable.  We owe, in effect, billions of dollars to God.  There are people who are indebted to us, who have wronged us in some way — but in comparison, those debts are small.

And Jesus’ central teaching on forgiveness is sobering.  We not only pray it regularly, he stresses it:

For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.  But if you don’t forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses (Matthew 5:12, 14-15).

Again, Jesus’ parable is instructive.  When we have been forgiven so great a debt, what right have we not to forgive those in debt to us, especially when that debt is relatively small in comparison. It may be that God can’t forgive us when we refuse to forgive others because our hearts are too hard and too self-righteous to receive his forgiveness.

RESPOND: 

Years ago I learned a principle from the world of cognitive behavioral therapy that has spiritual applications.  It is called the emotional bank.

Here is the concept:  when we are in a relationship, we have a tendency to think that our acts of kindness — like helping out with the chores, or doing someone a favor — is a kind of emotional “deposit” into the emotional bank.  On the other hand, when we do something unkind or wrong, we are also making “withdrawals” from the emotional bank.  We accumulate “capital” by our good behavior, and we lose “emotional capital” by our bad behavior.  If we withdraw more than we deposit, we end up with an emotional deficit with our family, friends, or co-workers.

That may sound a little mercenary, as though it reduces a relationship to a mere transaction. But it’s also pretty honest.  Whether we like it or not, we do tend to think of our relationships as transactional.  We might try to be more noble, but the emotional bank is a handy benchmark.

The parable Jesus tells suggests a similar transactional concept.  The “debt” incurred by the servant is colossal compared to the “debt” he is owed by his fellow servant.  I’m reminded of something else Jesus says elsewhere:

with whatever judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with whatever measure you measure, it will be measured to you (Matthew 7:2).

The truth is, there is no transaction that we can make with God to receive his forgiveness.  His forgiveness and grace toward us are incredibly costly.  When we forgive, we are in a sense drawing on his “line of credit” of grace toward others.

Once, long ago, when General Oglethorpe of the English Colony in Georgia said, “I never forgive,” the Reverend Charles Wesley retorted:

Then I hope, Sir, that you never sin.

As the cliche says:

We owed a debt we could not pay; Christ paid a debt he did not owe.

Lord, I can never repay the debt I owe you.  But I can follow your example on a smaller scale and forgive those who sin against me.  Give me grace to do so.  Amen. 

PHOTOS:
"70 Seven Times" by WELS net is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic license.

Gospel for July 23, 2023

Gathering Tares from Wheat, in the stony Fields of Bethel, Palestine (looking south).
“In the harvest time I will tell the reapers, ‘First, gather up the darnel weeds, and bind them in bundles to burn them; but gather the wheat into my barn.’” [Matthew 13:30, WEB]

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

Jesus tells another parable of the Kingdom of Heaven using an agricultural metaphor.  The Kingdom of Heaven is compared to a farmer who sows good seed in his field.

But, as with most good stories, a conflict is introduced, as well as an antagonist — a bad guy:

while people slept, his enemy came and sowed darnel weeds also among the wheat, and went away.  But when the blade sprang up and produced fruit, then the darnel weeds appeared also.

Darnel is a weed that looks uncannily like wheat until it is fully grown.  Only then can it be clearly differentiated by sight.

In the days before crop-dusters and herbicides and farm machinery, the servants offered to go through the field and pull all the weeds by hand.  But the farmer says no, because of the risk of pulling up the wheat as well.  His plan counsels patience — let the wheat and weeds grow up together until harvest, then they will be sorted, with the weeds bundled and burned, and the wheat gathered into the barn.

In the following verses, (31-35, which are not included in today’s lectionary Gospel reading), Jesus tells two parables, and then explains why he tells parables for his instruction.  The two parables compare the coming of the Kingdom of Heaven to a tiny grain of mustard seed and a small bit of yeast. These are both slow-growing and yet have a great impact when they grow to maturity. The grain of mustard seed becomes a larger tree, and the little bit of yeast permeates and leavens up to three measures of meal (about 3.9 liters or a little more than a bushel).

And Matthew, the narrator of this account, reminds us that Jesus tells all these things in parables in part to fulfill the Scripture from Psalm 78:2:

I will open my mouth in parables;
I will utter things hidden from the foundation of the world.

When Jesus has finished speaking, he returns to the house where he’s staying in Capernaum.  Now, the advantage of a disciple becomes apparent.  Those who stay close to him can ask questions:

His disciples came to him, saying, “Explain to us the parable of the darnel weeds of the field.”

So Jesus interprets the parable to them. Again, it does seem to have allegorical qualities in that the different figures represent specific spiritual applications.

  • He who sows the good seed is the Son of Man, i.e., Jesus himself.
  • The field is the world.
  • The good seed, these are the children of the Kingdom.
  • The darnel weeds are the children of the evil one. Are these the demons, or humans who reject the Son of Man?
  • The enemy who sowed them is the devil.
  • The harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are angels.

Ultimately, what Jesus is describing is the difference between the present time and the eschatological end of the age. Jesus is saying that the farmer/Son of Man doesn’t bring judgment prematurely.  The good and the evil are permitted to coexist until the end of this age.

At that time the angels will go out into the world and will:

gather out of his Kingdom all things that cause stumbling, and those who do iniquity, and will cast them into the furnace of fire. There will be weeping and the gnashing of teeth.

This is a stark description of Judgment, and part of the source for our impression of hell as a fiery furnace, where the damned wail eternally. In contrast:

the righteous will shine like the sun in the Kingdom of their Father.

Jesus concludes this teaching to his disciples by exhorting them:

He who has ears to hear, let him hear.

In other words, Jesus has explained his teaching as carefully and clearly to his disciples as he possibly can.  Now, it is up to his disciples to hear and apply his words to their own lives.

APPLY:  

On its surface, the scene that Jesus describes of judgment is worthy of Jonathan Edwards.  Jesus describes the time of harvest as the end of the age, when the angels:

will gather out of his Kingdom all things that cause stumbling, and those who do iniquity, and will cast them into the furnace of fire. There will be weeping and the gnashing of teeth.

Rev. Edward’s sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God (published July 8, 1741), uses far more lurid language:

The God that holds you over the Pit of Hell, much as one holds a Spider, or some loathsome Insect, over the Fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked; his Wrath towards you burns like Fire; he looks upon you as worthy of nothing else, but to be cast into the Fire; he is of purer Eyes than to bear to have you in his Sight; you are ten thousand Times so abominable in his Eyes as the most hateful venomous Serpent is in ours. You have offended him infinitely more than ever a stubborn Rebel did his Prince: and yet ‘tis nothing but his Hand that holds you from falling into the Fire every Moment.
[from Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.]

However, Edward’s depiction leaves out several important details.  He neglects to mention the patience that Jesus’ parable suggests.  The Son of Man is in no rush to separate the wheat from the weeds.  Part of that patience is because he is aware that attempting to separate wheat from weeds would likely result in doing more harm than good to the wheat itself.

But there is another reason for this patience.  Jesus began his ministry by calling for repentance (Matthew 4:17).  And when Jesus is criticized by the “righteous” of his day — the scribes and Pharisees — for his tendency to fellowship with “sinners,” Jesus says this:

Those who are healthy have no need for a physician, but those who are sick do.  But you go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,’ for I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance (Matthew 9:12-13).

It seems that in his parable of the wheat and the weeds, the purpose of Jesus isn’t so much to terrify as to warn the sinners, and describe God’s patient love.  He doesn’t burn the field, or tear it up, but waits until the end of the age.  Is this in order to give the weeds time and opportunity to repent?  I hope so.

RESPOND: 

Years ago I read a novel called The Damnation of Theron Ware. It is the story of a young, promising 19th century Methodist preacher who finds that his own understanding of the faith is somewhat shallow — but when he begins to discover a wider world of culture and intellect, it shakes his spiritual and moral foundations.

When he finds his faith wandering, and even his marriage in trouble, he flails helplessly and yet finds it difficult to admit his own mistakes. In one scene, though, he confides to a more experienced travelling evangelist, a woman named Sister Soulsby, who is far wiser than the young Theron Ware.  He tells her that he is considering something dramatic — leaving the ministry.  At this time, she believes that there is still hope for him, and she tells him not to breathe a word of that thought to anyone.  She counsels him to be aware of those around him, fulfill his obligations, and keep his more dangerous thoughts to himself — in a word, be wiser than he has been hitherto.  And then she says this when he casts doubt on the Christian doctrine that he has been charged with preaching:

“See here!” she exclaimed, with renewed animation, patting his shoulder in a brisk, automatic way, to point the beginning of her confidences: “I’ll tell you something. It’s about myself. I’ve got a religion of my own, and it’s got just one plank in it, and that is that the time to separate the sheep from the goats is on Judgment Day, and that it can’t be done a minute before.”

What she seems to believe is that Theron Ware is still developing, and it is premature to make a pronouncement of judgment until the end.

This is an important lesson to us.  It explains why good and evil coexist.  Because of God’s infinite patience, he delays judgment.  This is certainly the view of the Apostle Peter. When he speaks of the inevitability of the coming of the end of the age, he says this:

The Lord is not slow concerning his promise, as some count slowness; but is patient with us, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9).

The delay of the end of the age is for our benefit, and the benefit of those we love and those with whom we share the Gospel.  We are all to repent while there is still time.

Lord, sometimes it is difficult to understand why good and evil coexist in your world.  The devil and his minions seem to be robustly at work in our world.  But then you help me realize that you are infinitely patient, and that some of those who are now weeds might well become wheat before the Harvest at the end of time.  Help me to do what I can to bring in the good harvest.  Amen. 

PHOTOS:
"Gathering Tares from Wheat, in the stony Fields of Bethel, Palestine (looking south)" by Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library, UofT is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic license.

Gospel for July 16, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Matthew 13:1-9, 18-23
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

One of Jesus’ favored methods of teaching is to tell stories — parables, that draw analogies between ordinary things (farming, baking bread, business transactions, fishing) and the things of God.  We will focus on Jesus’ parables over the next three weeks, from Matthew 13.  The lectionary editors have declined to include Jesus’ own rationale for telling parables, from Matthew 13:10-17, and from Matthew 13:34-35.

In these deleted passages, the disciples ask Jesus why he speaks in parables.  His answer is that those who follow him will understand the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven; and those who don’t follow will become even more obtuse and more resistant to comprehension.  Jesus sees himself fulfilling the prophecies of Isaiah 6:9-10 and Psalm 78:2 — and he blesses those who do have the eyes to see and the ears to hear.

As Jesus begins to teach, he is sitting on the beach, but as the crowds push toward him he climbs into a fishing boat and speaks from this nautical pulpit to the crowd on the shore.

He tells the story of a farmer who goes out to sow seed.  When the farmer sowed seed, he reached into a bag and scattered it widely on the field.  This explains why some seed falls on the road, some on the rocks, some among the thorns, and some falls on good, fertile soil.  The seed on the road is eaten by birds, the seed on rocky soil can’t put down good roots and dies quickly under withering sun, the seeds in the thorns can’t compete and are choked out, and the seed in good soil has a good yield.

And Jesus then says, somewhat cryptically,

He who has ears to hear, let him hear.

As we’ve seen, those who follow Jesus and seek to understand will be granted understanding — those who are resistant just won’t get it.   The benefit of staying close to Jesus means that the disciples hear his interpretation of the parable so they can understand it.

In his interpretation, Jesus does draw some direct parallels that seem allegorical.  The seed represents the word of the Kingdom. We are reminded that the central message from the beginning has been the present and soon-to-come Kingdom of God.  After his baptism and temptation in the wilderness, he begins his ministry like this:

Jesus began to preach, and to say, “Repent! For the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.”…. Jesus went about in all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the Good News of the Kingdom, and healing every disease and every sickness among the people (Matthew 4:17, 23).

However, for those who hear the word of the Kingdom and don’t understand it — the evil one (represented by the birds), snatches it away.

The rocky ground is the heart of one who hears the word and receives it with joy, and even follows — for a while.  But this hearer is shallow, and has no root — and when persecution comes, they have no endurance.

The thorny soil is the heart that is too easily distracted by worldly concerns and the deceitfulness of riches.  Thick weeds overwhelm the good seed of the word.

The good ground is the person who:

hears the word, and understands it, who most certainly bears fruit, and produces, some one hundred times as much, some sixty, and some thirty.

APPLY:  

This is a parable for both the sower of the seed and the receiver of the seed — the evangelist/preacher and the disciple (who are often the same thing).

The evangelist is to spread the seed liberally — preach and teach and share the word of the Kingdom with everyone that we possibly can.  It is not up to us to determine who is ‘worthy’ to hear the word.  Our job is to share it as widely as possible.

However, soul-care suggests that we must also be aware of the challenges faced by those who hear the word.

  • The hard heart of the impenetrable roadside soil is vulnerable to the pecking of the evil one.
  • The shallow heart of the rocky soil needs to deepen the roots so that the seed can grow.
  • The weedy, thorny heart is distracted by too many other concerns to thrive.

Are these “types” of people who are merely hopeless, or is this a diagnostic tool that Jesus offers so that we identify where people are and help them become receptive? I’d like to think that the latter is true — because in a sense each of these compromised soils describes me at certain points in my own life! At times I have been hard-hearted, and shallow, and distracted by other concerns — and I am grateful that the sower of the seed has been persistent.

And then, there are the fertile soils that produce some one hundred times as much, some sixty, and some thirty. Here we have a realistic picture of ministry and the church.  Some ‘soils’ are simply more productive than others.  This should never be a source of envy for those who don’t produce the same results as those who produce one hundred times as much.  Rather, we should celebrate the success of others, and rejoice that we are able to participate in this kingdom work with our own measure of effectiveness.

RESPOND: 

Gardening and yard work have helped me appreciate this parable more than ever.  Weeds and thorns seem to flourish, and the flowers and shrubs I like are compromised.  I have a semi-circle of monkey grass that is infested with poison ivy!

What I have learned about yard work is that it is a matter of constant maintenance and attention.   Granted, this is not really the point of Jesus’ parable of the seed and the soils.  He is explaining why some hearts are receptive and others are not. However, I am reminded of Jesus’ words in the Gospel of John, where he uses another agricultural metaphor:

I am the true vine, and my Father is the farmer. Every branch in me that doesn’t bear fruit, he takes away. Every branch that bears fruit, he prunes, that it may bear more fruit.  You are already pruned clean because of the word which I have spoken to you.  Remain in me, and I in you. As the branch can’t bear fruit by itself, unless it remains in the vine, so neither can you, unless you remain in me.  I am the vine. You are the branches. He who remains in me, and I in him, the same bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.  If a man doesn’t remain in me, he is thrown out as a branch, and is withered; and they gather them, throw them into the fire, and they are burned.  If you remain in me, and my words remain in you, you will ask whatever you desire, and it will be done for you (John 15:1-7).

The farmer is very active in soul-care — he prunes the fruitless branch.  And we also need to take notice of this — he also prunes the branches that do bear fruit, so that they may bear more fruit.  This is a well-known technique among vine keepers.  And, as one preacher has said, when the cutting is happening, the vine doesn’t know the difference between being cut off and merely being pruned!  Pruning can be painful. Our job is to remain attached to the vine, which is Jesus!

Lord, I confess that there have been times that I have been like the roadside soil, or the rocky ground, or the thorny earth, and I have either not understood, or I have been shallow, or I have been easily distracted by the world.  Please forgive me, and plant the seed of your word in the soil of my life that has been cleared, prepared, and weeded so that I can be fruitful.  Amen. 

PHOTOS:
"Four corners" by Scripture Union is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic  license.