john wesley

Reading from Acts for March 31, 2024 (Easter)

Baptism_of_cornelius (1)START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Acts 10:34-43
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

This is a good example of some of the first preaching in the early church.  What is extraordinary about this is that it is one of the first sermons preached to Gentiles.

Prior to this, the Gospel had been proclaimed by the disciples to the crowds that gathered in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost, to believers in their homes, to sympathetic worshipers in the temple, to hostile officials and angry mobs — almost all of whom were Jews.

Then the Gospel began to spread to Samaria, and then to an Ethiopian eunuch — who may well have been a Jewish convert. Now, Peter must overcome his bigotry and exclusivity and go into the home of a Roman Gentile.

Truly, the command and the promise of Jesus to the disciples just prior to his ascension is beginning to come to pass:

…you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you. You will be witnesses to me in Jerusalem, in all Judea and Samaria, and to the uttermost parts of the earth (Acts 1:8).

This is the context — Peter has gone toward the Mediterranean coast of Judea, preaching and healing in Lydda and Joppa.  He was a guest of Simon the Tanner in Joppa when a strange vision from God appeared to him, which gives him the message:

What God has cleansed, you must not call unclean (Acts 10:15).

At that very moment, messengers from the Centurion Cornelius, stationed with the Italian Cohort of the Roman Legions thirty miles to the north in Caesarea, arrive at Simon’s house asking for Peter. Cornelius has sent his messengers because he also has experienced a vision in which an angel has instructed him to reach out to Peter.

Based on his own vision, Peter accompanies the messengers back to Caesarea — to the house of Cornelius, which is the setting of this message.

The message is an important example of Peter’s preaching:

  • It illustrates that the Gospel is beginning to spread to the Gentiles.
  • It includes the essential kerygma of the early church, which is the basic proclamation of the Gospel.
  • It reemphasizes the commission to take the message to the world.
  • Peter makes clear that this Gospel is the fulfillment of the revelation of God to the Jews in the Hebrew Bible.

Peter confesses that he himself has undergone a kind of “conversion” when it comes to being open to non-Jews.  He sees now that God’s covenant is not exclusive but inclusive, even of the Gentiles:   

Truly I perceive that God doesn’t show favoritism; but in every nation he who fears him and works righteousness is acceptable to him.

However, Peter quickly adds that this Gospel has come first to Israel:

The word which he sent to the children of Israel, preaching good news of peace by Jesus Christ.

Notice that Peter makes clear that the Lordship of Jesus is universal:

He is Lord of all.

Then Peter focuses on the earthly ministry of Jesus, of which Peter and his fellow disciples were all witnesses, and to the message of Jesus:

which was proclaimed throughout all Judea, beginning from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached; even Jesus of Nazareth, how God anointed him with the Holy Spirit and with power, who went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with him. We are witnesses of everything he did both in the country of the Jews, and in Jerusalem.

But at the heart of Peter’s message is the cross and the resurrection of Jesus:

whom they also killed, hanging him on a tree.  God raised him up the third day, and gave him to be revealed, not to all the people, but to witnesses who were chosen before by God, to us, who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead.

Note Peter’s distinction — not everyone saw the risen Christ, but those who had been chosen by God as witnesses.  Because they were witnesses, they had been given an apostolic authority and commission to preach the Gospel:

He commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that this is he who is appointed by God as the Judge of the living and the dead.

Peter closes by reminding his Gentile audience again that this message about Jesus that is now offered to them was revealed first to the Hebrew prophets.  The universal message of the Gospel is the forgiveness of sins through Christ:

 All the prophets testify about him, that through his name everyone who believes in him will receive remission of sins.

APPLY:  

Because of the passage of time and the differences in modern culture, we can sometimes forget just how radical it was that Peter consented to go to the home of a Gentile — who also happened to be a member of the hated Roman army!

Imagine being called upon to go to the home of a military officer in communist North Korea, or a member of the radical Islamic group ISIS, and we may catch a glimpse of how difficult this was for Peter.

However, God’s vision to Peter was very clear — God has no partiality, and anyone who has faith in the crucified and risen Christ will be forgiven, no matter what their race, ethnicity, or culture.

The message of Jesus Christ is eternal and universal — his offer of salvation is offered to all who are willing to repent and turn to him in faith.

RESPOND: 

When I preach the Gospel, it is vital to me that I include a few key ingredients that seem to me to be embedded also in Peter’s message.

It is important to me that I let people know how Christ has impacted my own life.  Peter does that.

But even more important, Peter proclaims the forgiveness of sins and faith in Jesus Christ, crucified and risen from the dead.  I really strive to make sure that the message of Christ is conveyed in every sermon I preach no matter what my text may be and how many other issues I may address.

John Wesley once wrote:

We are not ourselves clear before God, unless we proclaim him [Christ] in all his offices.

Although this seems like an old-fashioned way to speak, Wesley really is on to something.  Wesley also says that it is by faith that we:

receive Christ; that we receive him in all his offices, as our Prophet, Priest, and King. It is by this that he is “made of God unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption.”

What this means to me is that Jesus guides us into all truth as the Prophet who is our source of wisdom — that’s why we read the whole Bible, because it reveals the whole counsel of God.  As our Priest, Jesus reconciles us to God through his sacrificial death on the cross, and continues even now to pray for us as our High Priest.  And as King, Jesus is the risen Christ who rules over us forever, fulfilling his law of love in us as he restores us to his image and likeness and brings in his everlasting Kingdom.

Lord, help me to clarify the message you have revealed to us so that I can claim it by faith and, like Peter, do the very best I can to proclaim the Gospel so that others might also come to Christ and be strengthened in faith.  Amen. 

PHOTOS:
“Peter Baptizing the Centurion Cornelius” by Francesco Trevisani is in the Public Domain.

Old Testament for March 3, 2024

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Exodus 20:1-17
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

The Ten Commandments are regarded in Western culture as the foundation of Judeo-Christian law and morality.  These ten laws aren’t exhaustive.  Altogether in the Torah (which is the first five books of the Bible), especially from Exodus to Deuteronomy, there are over 600 laws, commandments and precepts.

These ten laws are essentially relational, prescribing the duties of humans toward God and one another.

God initially declares his claim on Israel.  He is Yahweh their God, who has delivered Israel from slavery in Egypt.  The covenant between Yahweh and his people is predicated on this history.  Before he was their lawgiver he was their Savior and Liberator.

The first four commandments may be described as “vertical.”  What I mean is that they address the human relationship with God.  First, God commands their absolute allegiance to himself.   No other gods.  The second is an amplification of the first — no worship of images.  The faith of Israel requires strict monotheism and no handmade objects of devotion.  God is the maker of all creation.  It is not creation that is to be worshipped and adored, but God alone.

God is described in very personal terms here — he is jealous of his worship, and punitive toward those who are disloyal; and he is loving toward those who love him.

Third, they are not to misuse the name of the Lord.  This isn’t simply oaths or cursing, but the attempt to manipulate the holy name of God for personal gain, or even purposes of magical incantation.  A name in the Hebrew mind contained in it the very nature and identity of the person.  So, to misuse the name of the Lord is to affront the very nature of God himself.

Fourth, the Sabbath is to be a day of rest for the people and their creatures, commemorating the culmination of creation on the seventh day when God rests from his acts of creating.  Just as God’s name is holy, so is this day to be holy — set apart.

In other words, there are to be boundaries between what is holy and what is not holy.

  • One God
  • No rivals
  • A holy name
  • A holy day

These commands are to remind them of the God who has delivered them.

The last six commandments govern human relationships.  These are the “horizontal” commandments.  But the fifth commandment, like the first, is a demand for reverence and loyalty — in this case, honoring one’s parents.  As with the second commandment, which promises love to a thousand generations of those who love God, the fifth commandment also promises blessings — in this case long life.

It would seem that every “civilized” society holds these five commandments in common:

  • Respect for parents
  • Respect for life
  • Respect for marriage
  • Respect for property
  • Respect for truth telling

The final commandment, though, crosses the line from mere external obedience into internal motivation.  Covetousness is that sense of greed or craving or envy that begins to penetrate and to corrupt the heart.  It might even be said that the sins of murder, adultery, theft, and even deception begin with covetousness.

Needless to say, these commandments are a cornerstone for a Biblically righteous and harmonious life.

APPLY:  

The Christian attitude toward the law is a little complicated.  The law performs the very vital function of revealing God’s will and his holy nature.  But as Paul illustrates in his Epistles, pure obedience to the law is impossible.

In a sense the unattainable nature of the law is built into it. The tenth commandment — prohibiting covetousness — makes clear that sin is more than mere action.  Sin springs from the heart and the will.

Jesus says as much when he says:

You have heard that it was said to the ancient ones, ‘You shall not murder;’ and ‘Whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.’  But I tell you, that everyone who is angry with his brother without a cause will be in danger of the judgment; and whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca!’ will be in danger of the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of Gehenna (Matthew 5:21-22).

And again he says:

You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery;’ but I tell you that everyone who gazes at a woman to lust after her has committed adultery with her already in his heart. (Matthew 5:27-28).

None of this suggests that the law is abolished or that it can be ignored (see Matthew 5:17-20).  It does remind us that the law is like a mirror that shows us what is wrong with us, and then drives us to Christ our Savior, who satisfies the law on our behalf.  Only with the help of the Holy Spirit are we empowered to fulfill the outer and inner aspects of the law. As Romans 8:2-4 says:

For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made me free from the law of sin and of death. For what the law couldn’t do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God did, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh; that the ordinance of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

To paraphrase John Wesley: “what God has done for us, he also does in us.”

Furthermore, the law is summed up by the law of love, in which we are commanded to love God and our neighbor (see Matthew 22:36-39 and Romans 13:8-9).  If we love God and our neighbor, it stands to reason we will also fulfill the Ten Commandments — and we will do so through the power of the Holy Spirit.

RESPOND: 

The law reminds me of the very holiness of God, and the very personal nature of my relationship with God and with other people.  If I love God, I will want to worship him alone, worship no other substitutes, honor his name and set aside a day for worship; and if I love other people, then I will obey all of the “horizontal” commandments as well — from my heart.

As 1 John 5:2-3 says:

By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and keep his commandments.  For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments. His commandments are not grievous.

Lord, how I love your law! And yet how I hate it at the same time! I love the guidance and the boundaries that the law provides. And yet I find myself unable, in my own strength, to perfectly keep it.  I pray that your Holy Spirit will enable me to keep the perfect law of love, in your strength and not in mine.  Amen. 

PHOTOS:
"The Law Is Like a Mirror" uses this photo:
"Do I Know You?" by Tom Waterhouse is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.

Epistle for December 10, 2023

God’s perspective of time and ours are very different

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
2 Peter 3:8-15a
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

Any serious student of the New Testament soon becomes aware that the concept of the parousia, that is, the second coming of Christ, is built into the DNA of the Gospel.  It is inescapable and inevitable.

However, even in the early church there were already those who were beginning to question this comforting doctrine, primarily because in their minds it was simply taking too long.

Sometimes in these lectionary snippets of Scripture we lose the full context.  Earlier in this chapter, Peter has posed the problem to which he is giving an apostolic answer:

in the last days mockers will come, walking after their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of his coming? For, from the day that the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.” (2 Peter 3:3-4).

Even within a generation of the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ, and the birth and expansion of the church, there were scoffers who were second guessing the teaching of the return of Christ!

Peter’s response is nuanced, and careful.  He doesn’t venture an opinion about when it might happen.  Instead, he reminds the Christians that God’s perspective of time and ours are very different.  He makes an obvious reference to Psalm 90, which is a haunting meditation on time and its consequences.  Psalm 90:4 says of the Lord:

For a thousand years in your sight are just like yesterday when it is past,
like a watch in the night.

So, Peter is advising them that people need to have a more eternal perspective.  Moreover, the reason for the perceived delay is that God is merciful!  The longer it takes for the end to come, the more opportunity there will be for repentance!

The language that Peter uses to describe the end is dramatic and apocalyptic. He uses the same metaphor that Jesus and Paul use — that the end will come stealthily, like a thief; but that it will also be a violent conflagration.

So, the application to the church is simple:

Therefore since all these things will be destroyed like this, what kind of people ought you to be in holy living and godliness, looking for and earnestly desiring the coming of the day of God.

There is a fascinating alternative translation to the latter half of this verse:
awaiting and hastening the presence of day of God
(transliterated from The Revised Standard Version Interlinear Greek-English New Testament).
This translation actually implies that how Christians live may speed up the coming of the Lord! 

The bottom line, however, is that for Christians the Day of the Lord is not to be feared but welcomed.  For the Christian it is not a day of destruction but of the joyful consummation of history:  

But, according to his promise, we look for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.

APPLY:  

There is an awful lot of theology packed into these verses.

First, we have to reckon with the same problem that Peter was addressing — why has the second coming of Christ seemingly been delayed?  I mean, from our perspective it has been forever!  Two thousand years!

So, we must address the issue of time and eternity.  The biblical answer to our dilemma is that God doesn’t see time the way that we do.  Some theologians like John Wesley would argue that for God all time is eternally now.  So, relative to God, our perception of time is like that of an ant’s compared to a human.  Stop and think — even a dog ages faster than we do as humans. How much greater is the difference between God as an eternal being and ourselves as finite mortals of no more than 70 or 80 years?

Peter isn’t necessarily arguing that we should impose a literal calendar on God’s timing — i.e., that one day is a thousand years to God, therefore it has only been two days from God’s perspective since the time of Christ’s earthly ministry.  Rather, he’s saying that God’s time is not our time. God transcends time as the Eternal One.

Ultimately, though, Peter is making the point that if there is a delay, it is only because of God’s infinite patience, and his love for sinners:

The Lord is not slow concerning his promise, as some count slowness; but is patient with us, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

By the way, this is not a claim for universalism, that everyone will be saved.  There is too much evidence in Scripture to the contrary — many will reject the salvation that God offers. However, it is a stern rebuke to the notion that some are chosen for salvation from the beginning and others are damned — God’s earnest desire is that all might come to salvation who will come.

There is another challenge that this provides us — those of us who are earnestly looking forward to Christ’s return are not to be slackers, or complacent.  We don’t know when he will come, but we are to live holy, godly, spotless, blameless lives as we look forward to the:

 new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.

There is a moral demand to the Gospel that we cannot escape.

Wiser minds than my own will have to parse out the variant readings in verse 12. One reading is that by living holy lives we may speed its coming, the other that we are:

 looking for and earnestly desiring the coming of the day of God.

These two translations have very different implications — one that by our active participation in the process we may have an impact on when the kingdom may come.  The other is more passive, that we are to simply wait eagerly, while we live the holy lives to which we are called.

I don’t know that it matters much, unless you subscribe to the notion that there is a realized eschatology.  By that I mean that there may be times when the kingdom of God seems to “break in” to our midst, when we become aware that God is present, perhaps in a moment of worship, or a tender moment with loved ones, or in an act of ministry.  Jesus said many times in the Gospels that the “Kingdom of God has come near.”  This has also been translated “in your midst,” or “among you,” and even “within you.”  In other words, the Kingdom of God can be realized now, at least in part, even though it is not yet present in its fullness.

One example of a preacher who seemed to believe this is Martin Luther King Jr., who said in his famous “I Have a Dream” sermon:

When we let freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day (emphasis mine) when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of that old Negro spiritual, Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!

Bottom line — we are to live holy, blameless lives by God’s grace, seeking to bring others to the point of repentance and faith, as we await the fullness of God’s kingdom at the consummation of history.

RESPOND: 

I sometimes find myself wondering why history has been allowed to meander along for two thousand years since the coming of Christ.  But Peter’s answer makes sense to me — that God’s eternity transcends my time; and his plan to bring as many as possible into his kingdom is much more patient and loving than I am.  My part is to live the holy, blameless life and bear witness to his Gospel every day.  That is more than enough challenge for me!  I can only live that life through his grace.   And that is how I must wait for his coming — in patient grace.

Lord, thank you for your promise to return.  But thank you also for your patient love that seeks to save as many as possible who will turn to you.  And thank you for your patience with me when I was wandering and lost. Come when you are ready, and when we are ready for you!  Amen.

PHOTOS:
Keeping An Eye On Time” by Ian Foss is license under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic license.

Epistle for December 3, 2023

Paul urges the Corinthians to exercise their spiritual gifts for the sake of the church, as they wait eagerly for Christ’s return.

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
1 Corinthians 1:3-9
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

Paul is writing to a church he knows very well — their virtues, and their warts.  He had planted the church in Corinth, and had spent at least a year and a half among them.

His greeting is fairly conventional for Paul’s epistles, but he quickly transitions into a personal salutation, giving thanks to God for the grace they had received.

Then he deftly mentions pertinent issues in his greeting that will be featured significantly in both 1 & 2 Corinthians — their “enrichment,” “speech” and “knowledge.”

Some of the controversies that Paul will deal with in this letter relate to a sense of superiority that some of the Corinthian Christians had assumed because of their particular gifts — especially in knowledge.  And his reference to “speech” suggests his awareness that some of them are questioning his authority because he seemed to them to lack the eloquence of preachers like Apollos.

He compliments them:

in everything you were enriched in him, in all speech and all knowledge; even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you: so that you come behind in no gift.

Notice that even when he is preparing the way for correction, or even a little scolding that will come later in the letter, he is trying to find some things that he can praise.

But he is also reminding them that these spiritual gifts are all in some sense transitional. He will make this especially clear in chapter 13 when he praises love as the ultimate spiritual gift, and the one of three that will endure (those three being faith, hope, and love).

And he points out that whatever gifts they may enjoy, the greatest gift ultimately is Christ.  They are not to be satisfied with the spiritual gifts that they receive, because they are looking forward to the time when Christ will be revealed.  It’s not the gifts that matter, it is the Giver of the gifts!

So, there is embedded in this short passage a little hint of Paul’s eschatology (his view of last things).  The Corinthians are to exercise their spiritual gifts for the sake of the church as they wait eagerly for Christ’s return.  And he promises that the same one who saved them and who gave them gifts is the same one who can keep them blameless from sin when the day of judgment arrives:

 the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

His last word, at least in this little excerpt, is a reminder that the one who called them is also faithful to keep them in fellowship with his Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.

APPLY:  

There seems to be a lot packed into this brief little introduction by Paul.  What can we take away from it?

First, we are reminded that God is the giver of all good gifts.  Paul will explore the spiritual gifts at some length in 1 Corinthians 12 – 14, so suffice it to say here that we need to claim the gifts that God has given us, and give all the glory to God!

More to the point, given the time of year, we realize that this is an Advent reading.  That means it is intended to help prepare us for the coming of Christ.  We are to wait eagerly, even as we exercise our spiritual gifts for the good of others around us.

Even more, we notice the emphasis on God’s power to purify us for that day. Paul says that God:

will also confirm you until the end, blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

This makes me think of John Wesley’s understanding of salvation — it is both pardon and power.  We are pardoned from sin, but we are also liberated from sin’s power to control us.  To paraphrase Wesley, ‘What God has done for us he also does in us.’

Let’s hope that we don’t simply see salvation as “fire insurance,” but that when Christ appears at last he intends for us to be holy as he is holy.

RESPOND: 

I tend to become easily distracted by the spiritual gifts, especially the flashy ones, and lose sight of the Giver.  As I look forward to the coming of Christ in history, I am praying that I will use whatever meager gifts I have to the fullest extent possible on behalf of the kingdom of God; that I may remain firm to the end; and that I may be purified by God’s grace so that I may stand blameless before the throne of grace.

Lord, as you bestow your gifts for ministry and service on your people, remind us that they are only a means to an end.  The end is ultimately fellowship with you.  To that end, keep us firm and faithful and make us blameless by your matchless grace.  Amen.  

PHOTOS:
Paul’s first letter to the Church at Corinth” uses this photo:
Seal” by KayVee.INC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license.

Epistle for October 22, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
1 Thessalonians 1:1-10
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

According to most scholars, 1 Thessalonians is the earliest written work included in the New Testament.  Paul may have written this letter to the church in Thessalonika from Corinth sometime around 52 AD.

He had only recently left Thessalonika.  He was at this time on what is called his Second Missionary Journey, which took him through Syria, Cilicia, Galatia and Asia — and then, for the first time, across the Aegean Sea into Europe. His journeys in Europe took him to key cities where he planted churches — in Macedonia (Philippi, Thessalonika and Berea) and in Achaea (Athens and Corinth).

This letter to the Thessalonians represents one of the earliest samples of Christian preaching and doctrine, some twenty years after the resurrection of Jesus and the outpouring of the Spirit at Pentecost.

As was common with ancient letters, Paul begins with a salutation.  He is writing this as a corporate letter, with greetings from the other two missionaries who are with him in Corinth — Silvanus, and Timothy. And the recipient of the letter is also corporate — the entire church at Thessalonika.

Silvanus and Timothy both appear elsewhere throughout the New Testament record.

Silvanus is believed to be the same person known as Silas in the book of the Acts of the Apostles.  At one of the key councils in Jerusalem, Silas was chosen, along with Judas Barsabbas, to accompany Paul and Barnabas as they set out for Antioch (Acts 15:22).  This was the beginning of the very missionary journey that would take them to their present location in Corinth. Silas is mentioned twelve times in Acts. One of those accounts describes Paul and Silas in jail together in Philippi, which proved to be a pivotal moment in their ministry there (Acts 16:25-32).  Paul mentions his colleague and travelling companion Silvanus three times in his letters (1 Thessalonians 1:1; 2 Thessalonians 1:1; 2 Corinthians 1:19). And we also find Silvanus mentioned by the Apostle Peter in his first letter, giving the impression that Silvanus actually helped Peter in the drafting of the letter (1 Peter 5:12).

Timothy, of course, is well-known as Paul’s young protege. The relationship of Paul and Timothy is that of an affectionate father with an adopted son. We know much more about Timothy — he was from Lystra in Galatia, the son of a Jewish woman and a Greek father.  Paul made a point of having Timothy circumcised because of his Jewish heritage, in order to avoid offending the Jews in Galatia (Acts 16:1-3).   Timothy often acted as a messenger for Paul, bearing his letters and bringing personal possessions that had been left behind.  We last see Timothy in Acts saying farewell to Paul in Asia, and there is some evidence that Timothy became the overseer (Greek episcopos, or bishop) of the church in Ephesus.  Timothy is mentioned six times in Acts; twelve times in Paul’s letters (not including the two letters that were written specifically to Timothy by Paul, 1 & 2 Timothy), and once in Hebrews 13:23.

These co-workers in the Gospel may also have been co-writers with Paul of this letter.

But let’s return to the Thessalonians.  Their identity and relationship with God are immediately established. The church is described as:

 in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ…

While we might be tempted to scan this greeting rather quickly, we do well to pause just a moment.  Because this is likely the first written record of the New Testament, these are significant words.  It is clear that God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ are being given equal billing.  Although the Holy Spirit is not mentioned until verse 5 and 6 in this passage, we have the beginnings of a doctrine of the Trinity.

That God is Father is a given from the Jewish perspective.  But when Paul says that Jesus is Lord and Christ, he is making an important claim about Jesus.  Jesus is not only the Christ (aka Messiah), fulfilling the Hebrew prophecies and expectations — he is also Lord.  Lord denotes more than merely a title of aristocracy for Paul.  In Hebraic thought, the word Lord is synonymous with the title given to Yahweh in the Old Testament — Adonai.  Based on that evidence, Paul is describing Jesus the Christ as God.   

And Paul offers a greeting that will become familiar to the reader of his epistles:

Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

Grace is one of Paul’s consistent themes throughout his epistles.

As he continues the body of his letter, Paul is personal when remembering the Thessalonians, their faith and their work.  He speaks in the first person plural on behalf of Silvanus, Timothy and himself, describing their intercession for the church:

We always give thanks to God for all of you, mentioning you in our prayers, remembering without ceasing your work of faith and labor of love and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, before our God and Father.

Paul calls the Thessalonians his brothers, and reminds them of their new identity.  They are chosen — the theological term is elect — and Paul celebrates the fact that they not only heard the Gospel, but the Holy Spirit reinforced this word with power and assurance. 

This provides a glimpse into the doctrine of Pneumatology (theology related to the Holy Spirit).  A survey of the work of the Holy Spirit as described in the New Testament suggests that power and assurance are frequently associated with the presence of the Holy Spirit.  The Holy Spirit’s power is manifested in such events as:

  • The Holy Spirit overshadows Mary and conceives the holy child within her, despite her virginity (Luke 1:35).
  • The Holy Spirit anoints Jesus with power, enabling him to heal all who were oppressed by the devil (Acts 10:38).
  • The outpouring on Pentecost, with its mighty wind, tongues of fire, and speaking in tongues (Acts 2).

And along with power, there is the unique work of assurance — what is also called the witness of the Spirit.  This sense of assurance describes the inward witness given by the Holy Spirit within the spirit of the believer. This inward witness makes possible the personal relationship that exists between believer and the Spirit:

  • The Spirit affirms the believer’s identity as a child of God:
    The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God; and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ (Romans 8:16-17).
  • The Spirit is also the intimate agent of communication between God the Father and the believer. Because the Spirit is God’s Spirit, he knows the mind of the Father; and because the Spirit is omniscient (all-knowing) he can penetrate every person’s thoughts, motives and emotions:
    In the same way, the Spirit also helps our weaknesses, for we don’t know how to pray as we ought. But the Spirit himself makes intercession for us with groanings which can’t be uttered.  He who searches the hearts knows what is on the Spirit’s mind, because he makes intercession for the saints according to God (Romans 8:26-27).

Paul then continues by reminding the Thessalonians of the ministry that he and his colleagues offered when they were in Thessalonika, and the impact that it has had on the church.  He says boldly that the Thessalonians became imitators of the three missionaries, and of the Lord.  The implication is clear — Paul is an imitator of Christ (see 1 Corinthians 11:1). Therefore the example that the Thessalonians see in these missionaries is a good role model for new believers.

Moreover, because the Thessalonians received the Gospel with joy, despite their affliction (presumably persecution), they now have become:

an example to all who believe in Macedonia and in Achaia.  For from you the word of the Lord has been declared, not only in Macedonia and Achaia, but also in every place your faith toward God has gone out; so that we need not to say anything.

The rumors of Thessalonian receptivity and repentance have preceded the three missionaries throughout Macedonia and Achaia even before Silvanus, Timothy and Paul arrived in those regions!

For they themselves report concerning us what kind of a reception we had from you; and how you turned to God from idols, to serve a living and true God, and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead—Jesus, who delivers us from the wrath to come.

At the very conclusion of this portion of 1 Thessalonians, which serves as a salutation, Paul sums up the essence of the Christian Gospel that he proclaims:

  • That God is the true God, and no idol such as the Greeks have previously been worshipping.
  • That Jesus is the very Son of God, and therefore divine.
  • That God has raised Jesus from the dead.
  • And faith in Jesus delivers us from the consequences of sin.

This is the eschatological hope for which they are waiting — for Christ who will come from heaven for his church.

APPLY:  

Anyone who has ever tried acting on the stage knows that part of what he or she is doing is imitating a character — and the best actors learn to think, feel, move, and behave like the character they are seeking to portray. This applies to one of the themes of Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians — that we are to imitate those who imitate Christ, so that we may be an example to others. The ripple effect of such a lifestyle can be profound.  The more we imitate Christ, the more others are drawn to Christ.

As Paul and his colleagues have proclaimed the Gospel and lived in imitation of Christ, the Thessalonians have sought to replicate that example in their own lives.  And as the Thessalonians have lived in this radical, new way, others have also been influenced.

We see this clearly when Paul writes:

You became imitators of us, and of the Lord, having received the word in much affliction, with joy of the Holy Spirit, so that you became an example to all who believe in Macedonia and in Achaia.

The concept of the Imitation of Christ has a long and distinguished history.  Although Thomas a Kempis wrote his famous book by the same name sometime between 1418 and 1427, the principle originates in the New Testament.

This is a serious challenge to all Christians, which has both inspired and discouraged multitudes for many centuries. On the one hand, this is a high calling to a heroic life.  As C.S. Lewis says:

Now the whole offer which Christianity makes is this: that we can, if we let God have His way, come to share in the life of Christ. If we do, we shall then be sharing a life which was begotten, not made, which always existed and always will exist. Christ is the Son of God. If we share in this kind of life we also shall be sons of God. We shall love the Father as He does and the Holy Ghost will arise in us. He came to this world and became a man in order to spread to other men the kind of life He has — by what I call “good infection.” Every Christian is to become a little Christ. The whole purpose of becoming a Christian is simply nothing else (from Mere Christianity).

Sadly, we also have many bad examples of Christians and Christian leaders who have failed to follow the teachings and example of Christ.  Today, we tend to hear this excuse most often — quite often even on bumper stickers — Christians aren’t perfect, just forgiven. This becomes a rationale for behavior that is quite unChristlike.

The excuse “well, I’m only human” may be true.  And, yes, it may be necessary for Christian leaders to publically repent and apologize — but a lifestyle that is inconsistent with the life and teaching of Christ can be subversive to those who seek to be disciples, especially when those leaders refuse to change because “they’re only human.”

The saying is cliche — which makes us prone to dismiss it — but it is nonetheless true:

Your life is the only Bible some people will ever read.

The Thessalonians saw the Gospel and the character of Jesus Christ when they saw Paul, Silvanus, and Timothy.  And they were inspired not only to believe, but to follow their example.  And they in turn became an example to others.

This is the way the Gospel spreads — when our words and our works are in harmony with one another.

RESPOND: 

A family member of mine used to say that her God was a “God of love, not a God of wrath.”  I think I understand where she was coming from.  She had been raised in the church, and I’m sure had heard more than a few sermons from the “fire and brimstone” genre. I surmise that God’s wrath was a frequent theme in those days instead of God’s love.

And yet.  And yet.  We cannot escape language about wrath, and judgment, and, yes, Hell.  Not if we are faithful to the Biblical text. After praising the Thessalonians for their faith, love and patience of hope, Paul assures them that they are loved by God and are chosen.  And then he reminds them that they now worship the living and true God who raised his Son from the dead, who is:

—Jesus, who delivers us from the wrath to come.

How do we reconcile God’s love and God’s wrath?

Perhaps the simplest way to do so is to be reminded that for humans, love  really describes our desire that the one we love be happy and blessed and receive good things.  Isn’t that generally true when we think of God’s love for us?  God desires that we have abundant life, blessing, and receive good things.  That seems to be a consistent theme of the Bible. God’s ultimate goal is our well-being. And that goal requires great sacrifice on his part to achieve it for us.  And it also doesn’t mean that we won’t endure temporary suffering before we receive an everlasting reward.

What is wrath?  Wrath is anger, and in terms of relationship, anger occurs when we are disappointed in someone or something, or when something has fallen short of the goal.  Wrath describes God’s reaction to the disparity between his will for us and, our will for us! This is what happens when we settle for something less than God’s best for us.  Biblically, God is angry when our lives and character separate us from him, harm others, and harm ourselves.  This is another way to describe sin.  Therefore God’s anger can be seen as an expression of God’s love.

God the Son has given up his life that we might be saved.  When we read language about God’s wrath we can often miss the point that his wrath — his anger — is not at us. God’s anger is against sin and evil and injustice.

As I’ve often said, expanding on an oft used cliche —

God loves the sinner, but hates the sin, because of what sin does to the sinner

Another way of putting this is another expression —

We aren’t punished for our sins; we are punished by our sins.

The following metaphor helps me get a little closer to understanding this concept, although I admit it is a very imperfect picture — suppose you, your family, and your whole neighborhood have been captured by a terrorist band.  They are holding you hostage.  They are threatening to shoot all of you, and the danger is imminent.  A rescuer arrives to rescue you, and he manages to free you so that you and the others are able to run away from the terrorists.  The rescuer warns you that you must run as far and as fast as you can, because he intends to destroy the terrorists and their weapons.  But instead of running away, you linger.  You have grown fond of your captors. But they are not fond of you.  They have you in their clutches, and are raising their weapons to fire on your family. your neighbors, and on you. They begin to fire. The rescuer must prevent the terrorists from harming all of the other people. He must fire immediately in order to prevent their violence. They will be destroyed. And because you did not separate yourself from the terrorists, you are also destroyed because you did not flee the wrath to come!

Granted, this is a crude analogy.  Our damnation is collateral damage because we refused to seek the safety that was offered.

John Wesley once answered his critics, who denounced him for suggesting that there was only one way to be saved. He said that his critics were right.  He did believe that:

For as there is but one heaven, so there is but one way to it, even the way of faith in Christ, (for we speak not of opinions or outward modes of worship,) the way of love to God and man, the highway of holiness. And is it uncharitable to think or say that none can be saved but those who walk in this way?

He then offers Biblical evidence that it is God who warns us that we must believe or be damned, follow holiness or we won’t see the Lord, and love God and neighbor.  But all of these warnings, from God or from God’s messengers, are inspired by love:

But is there any uncharitableness  [charity is also translated as love; so to be uncharitable is to be unloving] in this, in warning sinners to flee from the wrath to come? On the contrary, not to warn a poor, blind, stupid wretch that he is hanging over the mouth of hell, would be so inexcusable a want of charity, as would bring his blood upon our own head. (John Wesley: A Farther Appeal to Men of Reason and Religion, Section III,paragraph 3).

Our ultimate goal is to grow in grace, become imitators of Christ, and anticipate his return and the joy of fellowship with him in heaven.  But we must begin with the admission that we are sinners, and as such deserve the wrath of God.  We are immensely grateful for the grace and mercy that God has shown us in his love by sending his Son on our behalf.  And that means that we ask his forgiveness.

This is illustrated by John Wesley’s description of the early Methodists who met regularly to “watch over one another in love”:

There is one only condition previously required in those who desire admission into this society, — “a desire to flee from the wrath to come, to be saved from their sins.”  (from A Plain Account of the People Called Methodists, Section I, paragraph 8).

So, to my family member who believed in “love” over “wrath,” I would have to say that the most loving thing we can do is be aware that God’s wrath is the flip side of God’s love — he destroys the poisons and the pestilences that corrupt the good world that he has made.  And we must flee those poisons and pestilences and find refuge in God in order to be saved.

Our Lord, I pray that I might be encouraged to faith, love and patience as I seek to imitate you.  Thank you for delivering me from the wrath that is to come against all evil.  Amen.

 PHOTOS:
"iPhone app of Imitation of Christ" by minoru matsukawa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license.

Psalm Reading for September 3, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Psalm 105:1-6, 23-26, 45b
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

For the third time this summer, we are studying various verses of Psalm 105 (July 30 and August 13).  One reason for this is that Psalm 105 covers wide swaths of Israel’s salvation history in just a few verses — from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, to Joseph in Egypt, and concluding with Moses and Aaron and the deliverance of Israel from Egypt.  This Psalm has also served as a companion parallel to the Old Testament lectionary readings from Genesis and Exodus during this season.  Our Psalm reading for this week includes the first six verses, as have the previous readings, and then skips to verses 23-26.

This Psalm is known in Hebrew as a Todah Psalm — a Psalm of Thanksgiving.  The Psalmist begins with a series of imperatives, which give directions to the worshipers — from give thanks to remember.  

These directives are given in the language of a worship leader, calling upon the worshipers to increase their exuberance through prayer, praise and song.  Ultimately, this worship builds to a crescendo when they are seeking Yahweh’s face — the word panayim (face) represents the abiding presence of Yahweh.

And what are they called upon to remember?  They are to remember his marvelous works, wonders and judgments — but more specifically, the people are to reconnect to their covenant relationship with Abraham and Jacob:

you offspring of Abraham, his servant,
you children of Jacob, his chosen ones.

Abraham and Jacob are cited as two of the triumvirate of the original Patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac and Jacob).

But the focus for this week is God’s work through Moses.  However, we will return yet again to Psalm 105 on September 20, which will address the actual exodus of Israel from Egypt.

In the lectionary Psalm for this week, we are given some of the connecting background — how Israel came to Egypt (also known as the land of Ham, one of the sons of Noah) and multiplied until they became stronger than the Egyptians.

The Psalmist suggests that Yahweh uses the ensuing hostility of the Egyptians to fulfill his promises to Israel:

 He turned their heart to hate his people,
to conspire against his servants.
He sent Moses, his servant,
and Aaron, whom he had chosen.

Moses and Aaron were the instruments through which God would liberate Israel from slavery.

APPLY:  

The salvation history of Israel — and Christianity — is lived out in the lives of God’s people, and fulfilled by their lives, their actions, and their words.

And this Psalm also teaches us something important about worship — we don’t worship God in a vacuum.  Worship is not merely an abstract reverence for principles and ideals.  Worship, such as the worship called for in Psalm 105, is in response to God’s mighty deeds and his mission accomplished through people like Abraham, Jacob, Moses and Aaron.  In worship we remember those great deeds through liturgy, sacrament, Scripture and proclamation.

RESPOND: 

When my mom was still living, and I lived at home, we would often watch t.v. as a family in the evenings.  Mom would almost invariably fall asleep at some point during the show. On one occasion she woke up and watched the action on the screen, then said, “How did she get there?”

That became a family joke, when things didn’t seem to connect, or there were non sequitors in logic — “how did she get there?”

This illustrates the importance of reading the whole story in the Biblical record.  We can only understand the whole story in context.  If we read Psalm 105:23-26 out of context, we might well ask “How did he get there?”

I still like the synthesis of Biblical interpretation I came across years ago from Colin Williams’ book, John Wesley’s Theology Today (pp.27-28)Williams cites William Arnett’s compilation of Wesley’s rules for reading the Bible:

  • The literal sense is emphasized, “unless it implies an absurdity,” and “if not contrary to some other texts; but in that case the obscure text is to be interpreted by those that speak more plainly” (the words in quotes are from Wesley’s writings).
  • It is important to interpret a text in its total context.
  • Scripture must be compared with Scripture, and therefore a thorough knowledge of the whole is necessary for an interpretation of a part, “seeing scripture interprets scripture; one part fixing the sense of another.”
  • Wesley was always anxious that, where possible, Scripture should be confirmed by experience.
  • Reason is to be employed to understand what the Scriptures declare, and how this truth is to be declared to men.
  • The resultant exposition should be “plain truth for plain people,” free “from all nice and philosophical speculations; from all perplexed and intricate reasonings.”

Our Lord, your salvation history revealed in Scripture is our salvation history. When we worship you we are giving thanks for all you have done and will do, and for your mighty acts through the lives and deeds of Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebekah, Jacob and Rachel; Moses, Aaron and Miriam; Mary and Joseph; Mary Magdalene and all of the disciples; Paul and Barnabas, and all who have pointed toward you.  Thank you for their lives, and especially for your own life, death and resurrection.  Amen. 

PHOTOS:

"Open Bible - Resurrection Chapel - National Cathedral - DC" by Tim Evanson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license.

Epistle for July 23, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Romans 8:12-25
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

The Apostle Paul continues his line of thinking concerning the new life of those who are in Christ Jesus and walk according to the Spirit.

He returns to language he has used earlier, contrasting the life of the flesh to the life of the Spirit.  He declares that those who live according to the Spirit are not indebted to the flesh, nor required to live according to its demands.  This is a financial metaphor that suggests the cancellation of any obligation to the flesh.  We are reminded that Paul’s definition of the flesh includes those affections, attachments and cravings that lead one away from God and toward sin and death:

For the mind of the flesh is death, but the mind of the Spirit is life and peace; because the mind of the flesh is hostile towards God; for it is not subject to God’s law, neither indeed can it be.  Those who are in the flesh can’t please God (Romans 8:6-8).

He then articulates a rhetorical paradox:

For if you live after the flesh, you must die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live.

To ‘live’ after the flesh is to die; to die to the flesh (which means repudiating a lifestyle of moral corruption and decay that leads to death) brings life!  The paradox couldn’t be more radical — living after the flesh brings death; dying through the Spirit brings life.  This has been foreshadowed in Romans 6 when Paul speaks of being baptized into Jesus’ death:

We were buried therefore with him through baptism to death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we also might walk in newness of life (Romans 6:4).

Having established this principle, that dying to the flesh through Christ and being raised with him through the power of the Spirit brings new life, Paul introduces another mind-blowing concept — that those who belong to the Spirit are no longer in bondage, but are children of God!

For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are children of God.  For you didn’t receive the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption, by whom we cry, “Abba!  Father!”

Note the important statement Paul makes.  The Christian is no longer in bondage, but is adopted as a child of God.  We must be quite clear — though we were all created by God and loved by God, even while we were yet sinners (cf. Romans 5:8), it is through the witness of the Spirit that we become God’s adopted children.  It might be said that God has only one begotten Son, who is Jesus (cf. John 1:14, 18; 3:16); all the rest who are his children are adopted for the sake of Jesus and his sacrificial fulfillment of the law, and claimed as family through the testimony of the Spirit.

This new family relationship is strongly emphasized by the permission granted to these new children that they may call God “Abba!  Father!”

Modern scholars debate the Aramaic title Abba — whether it means Daddy or more formally, Father. In any case, it does seem to denote an intimate, even affectionate, relationship between a father and child.  Jesus uses this term one time that we are aware of — when he is praying to his Father in the Garden of Gethsemane (the night of his arrest, which leads to his death).  Mark’s Gospel describes the scene:

He went forward a little, and fell on the ground, and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass away from him.  He said, “Abba, Father, all things are possible to you. Please remove this cup from me. However, not what I desire, but what you desire.” (Mark 14:35-36)

Paul uses the term Abba again in a passage from his letter to the Galatians that closely parallels Romans 8:14-17:

But when the fullness of the time came, God sent out his Son, born to a woman, born under the law, that he might redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of children. And because you are children, God sent out the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, “Abba, Father!” So you are no longer a bondservant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ (Galatians 4:4-7).

The point is, those who are now in Christ are adopted as children of God in a new and intimate relationship. In fact, this last claim is what Paul says in the next few verses:

The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God; and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ; if indeed we suffer with him, that we may also be glorified with him.

The Christian knows that he or she belongs to God because the Spirit has told them so in their own spirit.  And as joint heirs with Christ, the Christian inherits whatever Christ inherits as the only Son of God — the believer is made brother and sister with Christ himself!

Paul does have one caveat, however.  There is an if involved with this adoption:

if indeed we suffer with him, that we may also be glorified with him.

Paul’s understanding of baptism and faith is not that baptism is a mere “symbol” and faith merely “belief” that certain facts are true. To become a Christian through baptism and faith is to be identified with Christ and his sufferings.  Paul says this very clearly earlier in this letter:

For if we have become united with him in the likeness of his death, we will also be part of his resurrection; knowing this, that our old man was crucified with him, that the body of sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be in bondage to sin (Romans 6:5-6).

We must bear in mind that there is the symbolic identification with the death of Christ in baptism — but suffering with Christ in order to be glorified with him may in Paul’s mind be quite literal.  He writes to a persecuted church, which knew what it was to experience discrimination, insult, and even violence.  (Those of us in the Western church may not be able to appreciate this in quite the same way as those in the parts of the contemporary church throughout the world where suffering with Christ is no figure of speech).

However, Paul also declares that any suffering experienced in this life is more than transcended by God’s promises to his children:

For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which will be revealed toward us.

Here is another dramatic contrast — between the sufferings of the present, and the glories of the Kingdom of God that is to come.  There is no comparison.

Still, there is a provisional nature to the Christian’s life in the present — the “not yet” of one’s life in Christ.

Paul expands his focus concerning the present and the future.  He claims that even creation itself is anticipating the eschatological age to come:

 For the creation waits with eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed.

Paul personifies creation as a being with emotions — it is subjected to vanity, the bondage to decay, and even groans and travails in pain.  Although Paul doesn’t spell it out, he appears to be basing his creation theology on the concept that creation itself has been infected by the same sin and evil with which humans have been infected.  We can’t help but think of the language of Genesis when Adam and Eve experience the consequences of their disobedience — even the earth is cursed!

…the ground is cursed for your sake.
You will eat from it with much labor all the days of your life.
It will yield thorns and thistles to you (Genesis 3:17-18).

Creation is not to blame for this curse — humanity is.  Nevertheless, God will use this curse in order to bring good out of evil:

For the creation was subjected to vanity, not of its own will, but because of him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of decay into the liberty of the glory of the children of God.

Therefore, the wonderful promise of the coming age is that not only will the children of God be delivered from the bondage to sin and death, creation itself will be delivered from decay and liberated to become what God intended at the beginning!

Creation groans because of its bondage to decay as it leans hopefully toward the coming age, and so do those who belong to Christ:

Not only so, but ourselves also, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for adoption, the redemption of our body.

Note that Paul is decidedly speaking of the “not yet” aspect of the coming of the end.

There are the first fruits of the Spirit that have already been given “now” to the believer.  Paul doesn’t spell out exactly what those first fruits are in this passage.  Sometimes he uses this phrase to describe Christ’s own resurrection, that has already taken place:

But now Christ has been raised from the dead. He became the first fruits of those who are asleep (1 Corinthians 15:20).

The concept of first fruits is grounded in the Mosaic law governing gifts offered to God (cf. Exodus 23:16, 19) from the agricultural yields of the fields and the flocks.  These were the first tokens, symbolizing the giving of the best to God. And secondly, the first fruits were offered as a reminder that all things ultimately belong to God.

But the first fruits in our passage no doubt are related to the foretaste given to the believer through the Spirit, as suggested elsewhere:

Now he who establishes us with you in Christ, and anointed us, is God; who also sealed us, and gave us the down payment of the Spirit in our hearts (2 Corinthians 1:21-22).

And Paul may also have in mind those qualities of character that are bestowed by the Spirit even now:

the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faith, gentleness, and self-control (Galatians 5:22-23).

However, they are still awaiting the fullness of salvation that comes at the end of the age. In fact, as he has said, believers have been adopted as children of God ­— and yet that adoption is not yet fully complete until the end of the age. And though believers have been redeemed by Christ’s blood, the full redemption of their bodies from the decay of this life isn’t completed until the end of the age either.

So Paul is obliged to speak of hope, not as something which has been completely fulfilled, but what is yet to be:

For we were saved in hope, but hope that is seen is not hope. For who hopes for that which he sees?  But if we hope for that which we don’t see, we wait for it with patience.

APPLY:  

This excerpt from Romans 8 has far-reaching implications — some might even say cosmic implications!

First, though, the impact of this passage is deeply personal and intimate.  Those who have been in bondage to the flesh and to fear are set free through the Spirit of God.

But wait (as they say in the advertising world), there’s more!  The unimaginable has been made possible — through the Spirit of God, we are adopted as children of God.  This is made possible by what Christ has done for us, as Paul explains in Galatians:

But when the fullness of the time came, God sent out his Son, born to a woman, born under the law, that he might redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of children (Galatians 4:4-5).

Our adoption as children of God is clearly grounded in the incarnation event of Christ and fulfilled in his death and resurrection.

And it is the Holy Spirit who completes this “contract” of adoption by witnessing inwardly to our spirits that we are children of God.  To be adopted into this family is to have all that Jesus has in his relationship with the Father!  We are on such intimate terms with God that we can talk to him as Abba Daddy. 

And if Jesus inherits a new, resurrection body, so do we!  If Jesus inherits eternal life, so do we! If Jesus inherits the right to sit in the heavenly places with the Father, so do we (cf. Ephesians 2:6).  According to Paul’s words, that we are joint heirs with Christ, we receive what Christ receives!

However, there is also the sense that, as the old cliche said, “If you can’t bear the cross, then you can’t wear the crown.”  We also are to suffer with him.  Obviously, Jesus has borne the cross on our behalf — we aren’t crucified for our own sins.  Jesus has paid that penalty for us.  Still, we are to identify with Jesus through our baptism, self-denial, and service.  As Paul writes in Galatians:

 I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I that live, but Christ living in me. That life which I now live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself up for me (Galatians 2:20).

And there is a second, cosmic implication of this passage.  Paul begins with comforting words about suffering.  I have thought and said these words many times in dealing with faithful Christians who are facing intense suffering and sorrow:

For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which will be revealed toward us.

However, Paul also addresses the bigger picture.  Salvation is not merely about personal, individual salvation — salvation also applies to all creation!  Creation suffered because of the fall of humanity — nature itself was subjected to the bondage of decay.  And, like a woman groaning in childbirth, nature itself groans and travails in pain.

When Jesus speaks of the tribulations and travails that prepare the way for the coming of the end of the age, he speaks of wars and rumors of wars and famines, plagues, and earthquakes (cf. Matthew 24:6-7) — and he cautions that these are not the signs of the end. And he says:

But all these things are the beginning of birth pains (Matthew 24:8).

In many ways, the argument that all creation has been subjected to the bondage to decay is a helpful understanding of theodicy, which addresses the theological problems of God’s omnipotence and goodness in the face of the existence of evil.  This view provides a possible explanation of the existence of evil in creation — natural catastrophes, diseases, etc.  They are not “permanent” aspects of creation — rather, like the birth pangs of a mother, they are temporary and transient and will be forgotten when the birth of the Kingdom of God is completed.

This also has implications for our Christian understanding of the natural environment and ecology.  Creation is suffering, and also causes suffering — but creation itself is eager to see the fulfillment of God’s plan for all things:

For the creation waits with eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. For the creation was subjected to vanity, not of its own will, but because of him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of decay into the liberty of the glory of the children of God.

God’s salvation is systemic.  God saves and restores not only individuals but all creation as well.

RESPOND: 

When we sing the old hymn “Blessed Assurance” by the blind composer Fanny Crosby (1801-1900), we are singing the theology of Romans 8:14-17 and Galatians 4:4-7 — the witness of the Spirit with our spirits that we are children of God:

Blessed assurance, Jesus is mine!
O what a foretaste of glory divine!
Heir of salvation, purchase of God,
Born of His Spirit, washed in His blood.

This experience is common to those who have made a decision to follow Jesus — people like John Wesley, who testified to a “heart strangely warmed” at a religious meeting on Aldersgate Street on May 24, 1738.

And people like Blaise Pascal, the French philosopher and mathematician whose heart was flooded with the light of Christ after a traumatic event in his life, on November 23, 1654.  He sewed a piece of parchment into the lining of his coat from that time on with these words:

God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, not of the philosophers and scholars… Joy, joy, joy, tears of joy… ‘This is life eternal that they might know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.’ Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ… May I not fall from him forever… I will not forget your word. Amen.

That we can be adopted as children of God for the sake of Jesus Christ is amazing.  That the Spirit of God whispers to our spirits that we are his children, and that we are entitled to call God Abba, Father is incredibly comforting.  The entire Godhead of the Trinity is involved in bringing us into relationship with God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

Lord, thank you that we are adopted as your children, and that you have made us your heirs.  And most of all that we are able to cry out to you “Abba! Father!”  Amen. 

PHOTOS:

"Hold me Daddy" by Matthew Miller is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic license.

Psalm Reading for July 16, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Psalm 119:105-112
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

Psalm 119 is unique in the Hebrew hymnal known as the Psalms. Psalm 119 is not only the longest chapter in the Book of Psalms, it is also the longest chapter in the entire Bible!

Psalm 119 is also an example of acrostic verse in the Hebrew Bible, meaning that each stanza begins with a different letter of the Hebrew alphabet.  Acrostic patterns also occur in four of the five songs of Lamentations, in Proverbs 31, and in Psalms 9, 10, 25, 34, 37, 111, 119, and 145.

The central theme of this longest Psalm is the supreme importance of the law and the commandments of God.  The section we consider this week begins with the Hebrew letter nun. 

The Psalmist begins very positively by addressing Yahweh and affirming:

Your word is a lamp to my feet,
and a light for my path.
I have sworn, and have confirmed it,
that I will obey your righteous ordinances.

The Psalmist has confidence that Yahweh’s word — particularly his commandments — provide guidance for his life.  The metaphor of lamp and light provide the vivid image of a path in the darkness illumined by God’s light.

However, the tone of the Psalm quickly shifts and becomes a lament or complaint.

I am afflicted very much.
Revive me, Yahweh, according to your word.

The Psalmist is asking that Yahweh keep his promises, revealed in his commandments.  He is turning to the ordinances and law of God in his time of crisis:

 Accept, I beg you, the willing offerings of my mouth.
Yahweh, teach me your ordinances.
My soul is continually in my hand,
yet I won’t forget your law.

The Psalmist’s complaints become a little more clear as he identifies the source of his distress — while maintaining his loyalty to God’s law:

The wicked have laid a snare for me,
yet I haven’t gone astray from your precepts.

This stanza ends on a soaring note of faith and hope:

I have taken your testimonies as a heritage forever,
for they are the joy of my heart.
I have set my heart to perform your statutes forever,
even to the end.

This section of Psalm 119 affirms the Psalmist’s confidence in the laws, commandments and ordinances of God as his sure defense even in the face of his enemies.

APPLY:  

God’s word — including the law, the prophets, the writings and the testaments — is our lamp and light even in a dark and dangerous world.

There are two things that are true of the Biblical world view:

  • The Bible is realistic about the existence of evil in this fallen world.
  • The Bible offers a vision of hope, even in the face of this evil.

Like the Psalmist, we do well as we walk the sometimes-darkened paths of this world to follow the word of God as a lamp to our feet and a light to our path.  God’s righteous ordinances, law, precepts, and statutes provide the living principles by which we can live.

RESPOND: 

Back in 1986, when I was still quite new to ministry, Amy Grant and Michael W. Smith wrote a song that they performed beautifully.  It is a paraphrase of Psalm 119:105-112.  In part, the song voices some of the same themes articulated in the Psalm:

Thy Word
Is a lamp unto my feet
And a light unto my path

When I feel afraid
Think I’ve lost my way
Still You’re there
Right beside me

Nothing will I fear
As long as You are near
Please be near me to the end.

This is the universal prayer of Christians everywhere and at all times — that searching the Scriptures and obeying its precepts brings guidance, assistance, and deliverance.

John Wesley (1703-1791) wrote in the Preface to his published Sermons on Several Occasions:

I want to know one thing, — the way to heaven; how to land safe on that happy shore. God himself has condescended to teach the way: For this very end he came from heaven. He hath written it down in a book. O give me that book! At any price, give me the book of God! I have it: Here is knowledge enough for me. Let me be homo unius libri [a man of one book]. Here then I am, far from the busy ways of men. I sit down alone: Only God is here. In his presence I open, I read his book; for this end, to find the way to heaven. Is there a doubt concerning the meaning of what I read? Does anything appear dark or intricate? I lift up my heart to the Father of Lights: — “Lord, is it not thy word, ‘If any man lack wisdom, let him ask of God?’ Thou ‘givest liberally, and upbraidest not.’ Thou hast said; ‘If any be willing to do thy will, he shall know.’ I am willing to do, let me know, thy will.” I then search after and consider parallel passages of Scripture, “comparing spiritual things with spiritual.” I meditate thereon with all the attention and earnestness of which my mind is capable. If any doubt still remains, I consult those who are experienced in the things of God; and then the writings whereby, being dead, they yet speak. And what I thus learn, that I teach.

This is the prayer of every Christian — to know God’s truths through the Scriptures, and then to follow those truths.

Lord, I pray following the model of the Psalmist — may your word be a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.  Amen.

PHOTOS:

"Psalm 119: Thy Word Is A Lamp Unto My Feet" by Michael Carter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

Gospel for April 23, 2023

START WITH SCRIPTURE:
Luke 24:13-35
CLICK HERE TO READ SCRIPTURE ON BIBLEGATEWAY.COM

OBSERVE:

The events in Jerusalem are still very fresh.  Jesus had been crucified on The Day of Preparation for the Sabbath. And on this day after the Sabbath strange rumors began to circulate amongst the friends and followers of Jesus that were scarcely believable.  To some, reports of the resurrection must have seemed a kind of cruel psychological denial, the rantings of hysterical, imbalanced women.

Two followers of Jesus were walking from Jerusalem to a village named Emmaus, about seven miles away.  Under normal conditions, it would be about a two-hour walk.  It would seem, as events unfold, that Emmaus was where these two had a home — perhaps they retreated there out of fear of the authorities in Jerusalem.  Or perhaps they simply needed to get away from the confusion and uncertainty that reigned in Jerusalem.

They talked about the events of the past days, perhaps trying to process and understand what had happened.  While they walk, a stranger joins them, going the same direction — west, away from the city.

The stranger asks Cleopas what they’re talking about.  We’re not sure who Cleopas was from the Biblical record.  He is only identified once, here in this passage.  His companion is anonymous.  Some suggest it may have been his wife.  John 19:25 does identify a Clopas whose wife was named Mary. This Mary was one of the women who, according to John’s Gospel, watched as Jesus suffered on the cross.  We can’t be sure of a connection.

The conversation that ensues following the stranger’s question almost seems a little sharp.  Cleopas seems a little rude:

Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem who doesn’t know the things which have happened there in these days?

This leads to the follow-up question, and Cleopas and his companion begin to explain:

They said to him, “The things concerning Jesus, the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people; and how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him up to be condemned to death, and crucified him. But we were hoping that it was he who would redeem Israel. Yes, and besides all this, it is now the third day since these things happened. Also, certain women of our company amazed us, having arrived early at the tomb; and when they didn’t find his body, they came saying that they had also seen a vision of angels, who said that he was alive.  Some of us went to the tomb, and found it just like the women had said, but they didn’t see him.”

This is a brief synopsis of the facts of the case.

  • Jesus, from Nazareth, was regarded by them as a prophet; they had hoped he might actually be the Messiah.
  • However, his condemnation by the religious authorities and his crucifixion by Roman rulers certainly undermined that hope.
  • Now, there were the incredible stories from some of the women that the tomb was empty; angels assured those women Jesus was alive, but none of the women could affirm they had seen Jesus.
  • Empirical evidence had confirmed this much — some of the disciples went to the tomb and found it empty. But none had seen Jesus themselves.

The stranger in turn is just a little insulting.

He said to them, “Foolish men, and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken!”

He calls them foolish, faithless and ignorant of their Scriptures!  And he asserts that all of these things that happened were prophesied about the Messiah:

 Didn’t the Christ have to suffer these things and to enter into his glory?

This stranger uses this two-hour walk to great advantage. He teaches them from their own Scriptures — from Moses (the Law) and all the prophets of the Hebrew Bible (which would technically include virtually the rest of the Old Testament) — about the work of the Messiah.  He is, of course, speaking of himself, but they still don’t know his identity.

When they arrive at Emmaus, they invite this stranger to come to their home with them.  This is not so odd as it might seem to some Americans.  Hospitality was and is an important feature of Middle Eastern life then and now. And given the time of day, they may have become concerned for this stranger’s well-being:

They urged him, saying, “Stay with us, for it is almost evening, and the day is almost over.”

What happens next is a remarkable moment of self-disclosure.  Jesus never actually tells the two disciples who he is.  He sits down at table with them.  And though it is not his home, he assumes the role of the host!  He takes the bread and gives thanks over it, rather than the head of the household.

When he breaks the bread, the two disciples immediately recognize him!  And he vanishes!  This reveals two things:

  • The breaking of the bread and giving thanks was a simple act of table fellowship, something that Jesus had done many times with his disciples. However, the events of the Last Supper had given this act a far deeper significance:
    He took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and gave to them, saying, “This is my body which is given for you. Do this in memory of me” (Luke 22:19).
    It seems significant that he is recognized in the breaking of the bread.
  • These events also suggest that Jesus has entered a new reality that transcends physical realities. Though he has a body, and can eat and can be touched, he also seems not to be bound by “normal” limitations of time and space.  We see this also in other post-resurrection appearances, when he seems to pass through walls.  John 20:26 tells us that he appears in the room where the disciples are, despite  the fact that the doors are securely locked.

The two disciples confess to one another that they had had the dawning awareness that something special had been happening earlier:

They said to one another, “Weren’t our hearts burning within us, while he spoke to us along the way, and while he opened the Scriptures to us?”

Despite the lateness of the hour, and the dark night — albeit, there was likely a moon — they rose up immediately and returned to Jerusalem.  One wonders if the pace was quicker on the return!

When they find the eleven disciples gathered together, their own experience is corroborated by Jesus’ appearance to others.  They are told:

The Lord is risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!

These various witnesses begin to confirm what is now undeniable fact — Jesus is risen:

 They related the things that happened along the way, and how he was recognized by them in the breaking of the bread.

APPLY:  

All of us experience loss and grief.  We seem to spend our lives saying farewell to people and places and even things that we love.  Sometimes that loss can be shocking, like the crucifixion of a beloved man like Jesus.

Grief requires that we process what has happened.  Therapists tell us that there are even stages in that process that are fairly typical — denial, bargaining, anger, guilt, acceptance.  We may speculate where the two disciples may have been in this process as they talked about the events that had only recently happened in Jerusalem.  But they did seem to be trying to make sense of it all.

And there is the twist.  Their process of grief was turned on its head when Jesus himself showed up!  There had been foreshadowing — rumors that the tomb was empty, angels announcing that Jesus had risen.  But these disciples knew nothing yet of the appearances of Jesus.

So, we find a different set of “stages” in this process that turns grief into faith.

  • First, Jesus walks with us, even if we don’t recognize him. We Methodists call this God’s “prevenient grace” that precedes that moment of assurance that comes with faith.
  • Second, the Scriptures themselves confirm the claims of the coming of Jesus, from Moses and all the prophets. In the hands of a good interpreter of Scripture, we can find types and prophecies of Christ throughout the Old Testament.
  • Third, there is the sense of corporate fellowship represented by the disciple’s invitation that Jesus should come and dwell with them. Jesus breaks the bread and was instantly recognized by them in the breaking of the bread. When we gather as the church, and share the bread of the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper, don’t we also have the opportunity to recognize him in the breaking of the bread?
  • Fourth, and by no means least important, is what we might call the inward witness. When the disciples finally realize that they’ve been with Jesus, they proclaim:
    Weren’t our hearts burning within us, while he spoke to us along the way, and while he opened the Scriptures to us?
    Isn’t that the personal, inward experience to which many Christians testify when they come to faith in Christ?

John Wesley’s experience seems to be emblematic of this very sense of assurance.  He describes his “breakthrough” one evening at a religious meeting on Aldersgate Street in London:

In the evening I went very unwillingly to a society in Aldersgate-Street, where one was reading Luther’s preface to the Epistle to the Romans. About a quarter before nine, while he was describing the change which God works in the heart through faith in Christ, I felt my heart strangely warmed [emphasis mine]. I felt I did trust in Christ, Christ alone for salvation: And an assurance was given me, that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.

All of these — the prevenient presence of Christ in our lives through his Holy Spirit; the proper interpretation and application of the Scriptures; the sharing of the means of grace through the Lord’s Supper in the church family; and the personal inward experience of the heart strangely warmed — contribute to the transformation of doubt into faith, and grief into joy.

RESPOND: 

I really wish I could have taken that walk on the road to Emmaus, and heard Jesus open up the Scriptures:

Beginning from Moses and from all the prophets, he explained to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself.

I have the feeling that he covered everything they needed to know — as we say sometimes semi-facetiously — from the table of contents at the front to the maps at the end.

I also wish that I could have been with them in the house in Emmaus. I would have reveled in his presence if Jesus had come into my home and broken bread — which is what the experience of faith can be like.

Henry Francis Lyte (1793-1847) wrote a hymn that reminds me of this episode in the Gospels.  Like the disciples on the road to Emmaus, he invites Jesus to come in:

Abide with me, fast falls the eventide
The darkness deepens Lord, with me abide
When other helpers fail and comforts flee
Help of the helpless, oh, abide with me.

Lyte had attended the University of Dublin with the intention of studying medicine, but instead became interested in theology and took Holy Orders.  When a good friend and fellow clergyman died unexpectedly, Lyte experienced a spiritual transformation.  After 1818, his preaching and writing became more urgent and spiritual.  He began to write and publish poems and hymns.

The hymn Abide with me was written in 1847.  Only three weeks after its completion, Lyte died of complications from tuberculosis.  His lyrics are poignant:

Swift to its close ebbs out life’s little day
Earth’s joys grow dim, its glories pass away
Change and decay in all around I see
O Thou who changest not, abide with me.

I fear no foe, with Thee at hand to bless
Ills have no weight, and tears no bitterness
Where is death’s sting?
Where, grave, thy victory?
I triumph still, if Thou abide with me.

Hold Thou Thy cross before my closing eyes;
Shine through the gloom and point me to the skies
Heaven’s morning breaks, and earth’s vain shadows flee
In life, in death, O Lord, abide with me.

May this also be my prayer this day:

In life, in death, O Lord, abide with me.  Amen.

PHOTOS:
"2 disciples on a journey to Emmaus with Jesus" by Leonard J Matthews is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic license